I think that the police should always act ethically. If the police were to act unethically they would be hippocratic and no one would respect them. The police can actually be brought to court for acting in an unethical way. Also if the police were to show unethical acts then our government would be going against every thing they stand for. In all, the police should act ethically.
4.10 Law officials should be able to sentence people only if theirs probable cause. I think police and judges should always provide evidence. By convicting people they should do it truthfully and honestly. If they have to go to extent to break a case then let them. All and all the roll of a police men is to enforce the law.
4.15 I don't think it's ethical for the police to convict suspected criminals by any means. I do think that the police should be allowed to follow a criminal to catch them in action. I don't think that law enforcement officials should be able to entrap suspected criminals. Maybe the police can do whatever it takes to get a confession at an extent. All in all the law shouldn't be broken by police if their is no other way.
If the criminal is only a suspect then no it is not ethical to bring them in. I think that the police should be able to fallow criminals depending on the severity of the crime. I don't think that anyone should entrap a criminal. Because most murderers are most likely insane. when crazy people are trapped they go crazy and do anything in their means necessary to get out. Police should be able to beat somebody depending on the crime they are suspected of. In conclusion, law enforcement should be able to break the law if the criminal is an outstanding criminal.
I think that they shouldn't be aloud to convict criminals by any means.I think that people who have been convicted have accident to so they should not get put away just because the cops can get them convicted of it. I also think the entrapment idea is not fair. Criminals are aloud a fair try to get away. All in all i think that the cops need to fallow the laws they make.
4.Toss costom. I think that it is not ethical to convict suspected criminals unless there is enough evidence to tie them to the crime. police should follow suspected but unconvicted criminals for a limited time only. Law enforcement officials should have a limit to the entrapment of suspected criminals. if the police were trying to get a confession there should be a strict line of how far a police officer should be able to go. the law should not be broken to make sure criminals are brought to justice but it would be fine to have the person watched over by the cops for a while.
4.16 It is not ethical to convict criminals by any means. The cops should be-able to follow suspected criminals, but not to catch them committing other crimes. Cops should be-able to entrap suspected criminals if the crime they are doing is illegal. It should not be aloud for cops to do whatever it takes juste to make someone confess. The law should not be broken to to make sure a criminal is in justice.
It is ethical to convict a suspect by any means. The police should be able to follow suspect(unconvicted criminals)to make sure nothing happens like what almost happenned to Lori in Tenderness at the motel. Also cops should be able to do whatever they need in order to get answers. The law should be broken to make sure suspected criminals are brought to justice. We dont want non-criminals doin the time for something they didnt do.
I think it's unethical to convict suspected criminals by any means. Police should be able to follow suspected but unconvicted criminals to catch them committing other crimes. Law enforcement officials should be able to entrap suspected criminals. The police should not be able to do whatever it takes to get confessions from suspected criminals. The law should NEVER be broken to make sure that suspected criminals are brought to justice.
I dont think police officers should be able to break the law to catch other civillians.One reason i disagre with them being able to break the law is looking back on leader ship witch is a very important thing in america. If i was to cheat to win a basketball game would that be fair. Thinking criticaly if a police man cactches you with out breaking the law that would be perfect leader ship and thats how we want the younger genarations to follw. In fact we dont need police to partisapate with the law. 4.26
4.8 No i don't think that they should be able to do anything to catch a convict. I don't think that cops should be able to follow anyone because they might be following a innocent and might be arrested for something he did not commit. I do not think that they should be able to entrap criminals because it wont be fair if they go to jail only because they got tricked by a cop. I don't think that they should be able to do anything because they might frighten or scare a innocent person to admit he did something that he did not. I think that the law should only be broken if they are absolutely sure that the guy convicted really did the crime they are not responsible for.
4.1 It is not ethical to convict suspected criminals by any means. The police should not be able to follow suspected but unconvicted criminals to catch them committing other crimes because thats fixed evidence. Law enforcement officials shouldn't be able to entrap suspected criminals either because their job is to catch people that have committed crimes not setting them up. Police shouldn't be able to do whatever it takes to get confessions from suspected criminals because the criminals also have rights and it would be against the law in the United States. I'm sure that the law has been broken to make sure that suspected criminals are brought to justice.
4,21 I think it is ethnical to convict suspected criminals by any means. The cops should be able to follow a suspect to catch them. cops should be able to entrap suspects to catch them. cops should also be aloud to do what ever it takes to get a confession. I think the law can only be broken in special cases.
4.19 It should not be ethical to convict suspected criminals by any means. Police should not be able to follow suspected criminals to catch them committing other crimes. Law enforcement should be able to entrap suspected criminals but only to a certain extant. I think law enforcement should not be able to do what ever it takes to get them to confess. All in all the law should not be broken to make sure that suspected criminals are brought to justice.
It is not ethical to convict suspected criminals by any means because maybe that criminal wasn't guilty for that particular crime. Non convicted criminals shouldn't be followed, because they should have another chance. The law enforcement should have a good enough reason to try to trap suspected criminals. If a person is the actual criminal the police should definitely follow suspected criminals. All in all, the law shouldn't always be broken to make sure that suspected criminals to be brought to justice.
I do not believe that cops should be able to do anything they want to catch a suspected criminal. Police should not be able to follow people around if they have not been convicted. My thoughts are this way because the police have no official proof that they are up to anything without a conviction. Entrapment is a different thing. This is because if someone is stupid enough to walk right into the trap then they deserve to be caught. These are my thoughts on cops that follow people and set traps for people to walk into.
I believe that police should always act ethically to be able to convict suspected criminals. The police should also follow suspected criminals and catch them committing other crimes if its necessary. Law enforcement officials should entrap criminals if the crime is hard yo be solved. I don't think the police should do whatever it takes to get confessions from criminals unless it is necessary. Obviously, the law should never be broken to make sure criminals are brought to justice.
30 comments:
4.4.futo-kan
I think that the police should always act ethically. If the police were to act unethically they would be hippocratic and no one would respect them. The police can actually be brought to court for acting in an unethical way. Also if the police were to show unethical acts then our government would be going against every thing they stand for. In all, the police should act ethically.
4.10
Law officials should be able to sentence people only if theirs probable cause. I think police and judges should always provide evidence. By convicting people they should do it truthfully and honestly. If they have to go to extent to break a case then let them. All and all the roll of a police men is to enforce the law.
4.15
I don't think it's ethical for the police to convict suspected criminals by any means. I do think that the police should be allowed to follow a criminal to catch them in action. I don't think that law enforcement officials should be able to entrap suspected criminals. Maybe the police can do whatever it takes to get a confession at an extent. All in all the law shouldn't be broken by police if their is no other way.
4.18
MADRacing
If the criminal is only a suspect then no it is not ethical to bring them in. I think that the police should be able to fallow criminals depending on the severity of the crime. I don't think that anyone should entrap a criminal. Because most murderers are most likely insane. when crazy people are trapped they go crazy and do anything in their means necessary to get out. Police should be able to beat somebody depending on the crime they are suspected of. In conclusion, law enforcement should be able to break the law if the criminal is an outstanding criminal.
4.10 I also agree with number 24 because police should always act ethically.
4.25 sad man223
I think that they shouldn't be aloud to convict criminals by any means.I think that people who have been convicted have accident to so they should not get put away just because the cops can get them convicted of it. I also think the entrapment idea is not fair. Criminals are aloud a fair try to get away. All in all i think that the cops need to fallow the laws they make.
4.10 I also agree with #18 because it depends if they're a suspect or not.
4.Toss costom. I think that it is not ethical to convict suspected criminals unless there is enough evidence to tie them to the crime. police should follow suspected but unconvicted criminals for a limited time only. Law enforcement officials should have a limit to the entrapment of suspected criminals. if the police were trying to get a confession there should be a strict line of how far a police officer should be able to go. the law should not be broken to make sure criminals are brought to justice but it would be fine to have the person watched over by the cops for a while.
4.4.futo-kan
I agree with 4.18 it is unethical.
4.15
I agree with mad racing that if a criminal is only a suspect it's not ethical to bring them in.
4.16
It is not ethical to convict criminals by any means. The cops should be-able to follow suspected criminals, but not to catch them committing other crimes. Cops should be-able to entrap suspected criminals if the crime they are doing is illegal. It should not be aloud for cops to do whatever it takes juste to make someone confess. The law should not be broken to to make sure a criminal is in justice.
4.25 sad man223
i Also agree with number 24 police need to act ethically
4.4.futo-kan
I disagree with 4.10 because then the police them salves are breaking the law.
4.09. TWiiTcH
It is ethical to convict a suspect by any means. The police should be able to follow suspect(unconvicted criminals)to make sure nothing happens like what almost happenned to Lori in Tenderness at the motel. Also cops should be able to do whatever they need in order to get answers. The law should be broken to make sure suspected criminals are brought to justice. We dont want non-criminals doin the time for something they didnt do.
4. 12
I think it's unethical to convict suspected criminals by any means. Police should be able to follow suspected but unconvicted criminals to catch them committing other crimes. Law enforcement officials should be able to entrap suspected criminals. The police should not be able to do whatever it takes to get confessions from suspected criminals. The law should NEVER be broken to make sure that suspected criminals are brought to justice.
I dont think police officers should be able to break the law to catch other civillians.One reason i disagre with them being able to break the law is looking back on leader ship witch is a very important thing in america. If i was to cheat to win a basketball game would that be fair. Thinking criticaly if a police man cactches you with out breaking the law that would be perfect leader ship and thats how we want the younger genarations to follw. In fact we dont need police to partisapate with the law. 4.26
4.8
No i don't think that they should be able to do anything to catch a convict. I don't think that cops should be able to follow anyone because they might be following a innocent and might be arrested for something he did not commit. I do not think that they should be able to entrap criminals because it wont be fair if they go to jail only because they got tricked by a cop. I don't think that they should be able to do anything because they might frighten or scare a innocent person to admit he did something that he did not. I think that the law should only be broken if they are absolutely sure that the guy convicted really did the crime they are not responsible for.
4.16
I agree with 10 because their should have evidence to be-able convict people.
4.1
It is not ethical to convict suspected criminals by any means. The police should not be able to follow suspected but unconvicted criminals to catch them committing other crimes because thats fixed evidence. Law enforcement officials shouldn't be able to entrap suspected criminals either because their job is to catch people that have committed crimes not setting them up. Police shouldn't be able to do whatever it takes to get confessions from suspected criminals because the criminals also have rights and it would be against the law in the United States. I'm sure that the law has been broken to make sure that suspected criminals are brought to justice.
4,21
I think it is ethnical to convict suspected criminals by any means. The cops should be able to follow a suspect to catch them. cops should be able to entrap suspects to catch them. cops should also be aloud to do what ever it takes to get a confession. I think the law can only be broken in special cases.
4.1
I agree, 4.4.futo-kan, police should always act ethically
4.16
I agree with 15 because cops should not break the law to try to convict that person.
4.19
It should not be ethical to convict suspected criminals by any means. Police should not be able to follow suspected criminals to catch them committing other crimes. Law enforcement should be able to entrap suspected criminals but only to a certain extant. I think law enforcement should not be able to do what ever it takes to get them to confess. All in all the law should not be broken to make sure that suspected criminals are brought to justice.
4. 14
toss costom
i agree with 10 because if there is a posabilty that the suspected criminal did the crime that they should hold him until they are proven innocent.
4.13 Britt
It is not ethical to convict suspected criminals by any means because maybe that criminal wasn't guilty for that particular crime. Non convicted criminals shouldn't be followed, because they should have another chance. The law enforcement should have a good enough reason to try to trap suspected criminals. If a person is the actual criminal the police should definitely follow suspected criminals. All in all, the law shouldn't always be broken to make sure that suspected criminals to be brought to justice.
I agree with 15 and 16
4.18
MADRacing
I disagree with number 4 because police should use any force necessary to take down a criminal.
4.1
I think that 4.Toss costom is trying to say that police should not make evidence but find it.
4.3- Midget
I do not believe that cops should be able to do anything they want to catch a suspected criminal. Police should not be able to follow people around if they have not been convicted. My thoughts are this way because the police have no official proof that they are up to anything without a conviction. Entrapment is a different thing. This is because if someone is stupid enough to walk right into the trap then they deserve to be caught. These are my thoughts on cops that follow people and set traps for people to walk into.
4.20
I believe that police should always act ethically to be able to convict suspected criminals. The police should also follow suspected criminals and catch them committing other crimes if its necessary. Law enforcement officials should entrap criminals if the crime is hard yo be solved. I don't think the police should do whatever it takes to get confessions from criminals unless it is necessary. Obviously, the law should never be broken to make sure criminals are brought to justice.
Post a Comment