It is ethical to convict a suspect by any means. Cops should be able to follow suspected but unconvicted criminal to catch them in their crimes. Cops should also be able to entrap suspected criminals. I think that cops should be able to do anything to get the truth. It doesn't matter If laws are broken just catch the criminal. in conclusion I think convicted criminals of big crimes should just be shot and then we wouldn't spend money on keeping them alive.
1.12 Criminals have rights too so cops should have to follow some rules. I don't think they should be able to follow them. They need to catch them just like the other times. I don't think they should be able to entrap criminals. No i don't think they should be able to do what ever you want. They need to have limits. I think they should be able to brake the law to get the criminal. In conclusion, I think they need to do what ever they need to do.
1.laptop 13 the police should follow a set of rules to convict criminals. they should be able to follow the suspected for a while. they should not be able to set up a suvire trap but can set up a minor trap.the cops should not be allowed to use any means but ones that are nessasary to get an answer. All and all they should be able to brake the law if needed.
period 1. comp. 16 i think that the police should follow the rules just like everybody else, because they are citizens also and they shouldn't be able to break the law. they should be able to entrap suspected criminals because if the cops think that they are doing something wrong then they can catch them. I don't think cops should be able to do what ever they want or can to get confessions from criminals because they can either kill them or injure them real badly. It depends what kind of law they are breaking if its something that is going to catch the guys and its the only way then i think its okay, but that doesn't mean that you can do it all the time.
I think the police should follow the same rules as us. Its okay to follow them and catch them in the act because then you have proof. I also think that its okay to entrap suspected criminals because it will keep people safe when they go to jail. Unless its something small like shoplifting. Police shouldn't be able to do whatever it takes because they can torture them and thats never right. Also,the law should never be broken even by police because if we cant do it, they shouldn't be able to either. In conclusion,there are some rules that can be broken but police should be able to do what we do.
2.26 The police should be able to do anything convict a suspect. I think the police shouldn't follow a suspect unless they are convicted because suspects still have rights. I don't think they should be allowed to entrap suspected criminals because they may not be a criminal.I think that the enforcement shouldn't be able to do whatever it takes to get a confession from a suspected criminal.In conclusion, I think that the police shouldn't be able to break the law because the suspected criminals might not be actual criminals.
period 1 computer 20 Police should always act ethically. I don't think it is ethical to convict suspected criminals by any means unless they have proof that the criminal committed the crime. The police should be able to follow suspected but unconvicted criminals to catch them committing other crimes but they should not be able to set them up or frame them for anything. Law enforcement officials should not be able to entrap suspected criminals. They should have to find proof that the criminal committed the crime by them selfs. Cops should not be able to do whatever it takes to get confessions from suspected criminals because the suspect might confess just so they stop even if they didn't do it. in conclusion, the law should not be broken in any way even if it was to make sure that suspected criminals are brought to justice.
Period 1 computer 4 I think the police should always act ethically no matter what the situation is. Because if they overreact when they are arresting people, because if they did something petty the cops would want to beat them or treat them unfairly. I think they shouldn't be able to follow suspected criminals just to see if they are going to commit another crime, they should just arrest them. The police shouldn't be able to do what ever is possible to get confessions out of people. The law should not be broken to catch a suspected criminal they should just do their job.
1.23 I think the police should act ethical, but we all know they don't! police need to follow laws because they have no sense of right or wrong they do what they want and i hate them all for it. my grandfather ,chuck, is no exception. Police shouldn't be aloud to arrest people they suspect because people they suspect are every teenager around, and anyone in baggy clothes. They really shouldn't allow cops to make some one confess ether since I don't feel like being beat to death for jay walking or asking a cop for his doughnut since we all know they would kill me over something stupid like that. The law could be broken cops do it all the time it just shouldn't be aloud! all in all i hate cops and they need to follow the laws!
1.11- The cops should be able to use anything they can to convict criminals. The police should be able to follow the criminals that are suspected of crimes they haven't been charged for. Although the police should be able to follow criminals, they shouldn't be allowed to set traps for the criminals to fall into. The police should be allowed to question the perps. but not beat them, or deprive them of food or water. There are, however, some circumstances where the cops should be able to use force. In conclusion the should not be broken to bring a criminal in. If the cops break the law that will only make it seem alright for every day citizens to break the law.
period 1.#6 Well I think that the police should have to follow rules to convict suspected criminals. I think that police should only be able to follow suspected but unconvinced criminals to catch them committing other crimes if that criminal is suspected of murder. Again I only think that police should be able to entrap criminals if they are suspected of murder. The police should only be able to do whatever it takes to get confessions from suspected murderers. In conclusion, I think the law could only be broken to make sure that suspected murderers are brought to justice.
period 1 computer 20 i agree with computer 12. Cops should have to follow the rules just like every one else. They should not have the rights to break the rules just to catch a criminal. The rules weren't just made for fun, they were made for a good reason.
24 Yes I think that it is okay for a cop to go to certain extents to catch a suspected criminal. But only for serious crimes the person may have committed. But the downside is that if the person is convicted for a crime he/she didn't do then the person is screwed for life. People may disagree and say that it is not okay for people to break the law to catch someone and they have rights like everyone else. But cops would rather be safe than sorry.
Period 1. #19. Law enforcement should have to always act ethically. I think that it is unethical to convict suspected criminals by any means.I think that the police should be allowed to follow suspected but unconvinced criminals to catch them other crimes. Law enforcement officials should be able to entrap suspected criminals. The police should be able to do whatever it takes to get confessions from suspected criminals. All in all, I think that it depends on what the crime that was committed is and that depends on the laws police should abide by.
yes i think that cops should do whatever it takes to get the criminals in jail like interrogations beatings if within reason like only if the perp is resisting arrest or and starts to run but not if its like something stupid for j walking or accidentally runs a red light so all i'm saying is leave the innocents alone and do your job and get the real criminals lazy B******* get of those doughnuts and coffee and get in shape for some of you. quit trying to get any arrest you can because thats how people hate cops like me
I don't think it is ethical to convict suspected criminals by unnecessary means. Until law enforcement could prove that they had committed the crime, they should be able to let them go. Stalking should be banned, they should just make sure they have their last location on record and move from there. Confessions are the same way, if they don't wanna talk, persuade them, vocally, not abusively. Laws should not be broken to make sure that criminals are brought to justice. In the end, law abiding citizens, or what the police call "suspected criminals", should be let free. They shouldn't fret if they didn't get to put someone in the shocker chair. Anarchy would probably be the better choice in my opinion.
1.23 14 a little harsh criminals are just people who want freedoms and when freedoms are outlawed only outlaws are free so why should they suffer for it.
It is ethical for police to convict suspected criminals by any means. Police should be able to follow suspected unconvicted criminals to catch that person committing crimes. Police can entrap suspected criminals but they need to have their rights read to them. Police should be able to do what they need to get a confession out of someone, but should only be used in the right cases like if just ran a red light it really shouldn't be necessary. The law should be broken every once and a while, but they should only do it in certain cases.
1.10 It is not ethical to convict suspected criminals by any means. Depending what they are suspected of doing they should not be followed if they have only gotten a misdemeanor. If they are committing a felony the cops should be able to entrap the suspect. No the cops should not be able do whatever they want to get confessions out of people depending on what they have done. No the law cannot be broken so the cops can do whatever they to catch suspected criminals.
1.8 I don't think that the police should be able to follow other people because if they already got out of jail then that's why those people are free. For example in Eric's case putting a trap on him isn't the right thing to do. Proctor should just leave him alone, and if Eric decides to commit another crime then thats his choice. The truth will reveal itself sometime. I don't think the law should be broken to catch another criminal because then it wouldn't be fair because that person that broke the law to catch someone else now has to serve time too. In conclusion think that everyone has the same rights, and cops shouldn't be able to do what they want...
6/7.3 I think that cops are rude an take advantage of there job. They should not be able to suspect people in less they no someone is doing something wrong. They should not be able to do what they want because they take advantage of people. To just get them in trouble. No the law should never be broken because they just get people in trouble.
28 comments:
1.14
It is ethical to convict a suspect by any means. Cops should be able to follow suspected but unconvicted criminal to catch them in their crimes. Cops should also be able to entrap suspected criminals. I think that cops should be able to do anything to get the truth. It doesn't matter If laws are broken just catch the criminal. in conclusion I think convicted criminals of big crimes should just be shot and then we wouldn't spend money on keeping them alive.
1.12
Criminals have rights too so cops should have to follow some rules. I don't think they should be able to follow them. They need to catch them just like the other times. I don't think they should be able to entrap criminals. No i don't think they should be able to do what ever you want. They need to have limits. I think they should be able to brake the law to get the criminal. In conclusion, I think they need to do what ever they need to do.
1.laptop 13
the police should follow a set of rules to convict criminals. they should be able to follow the suspected for a while. they should not be able to set up a suvire trap but can set up a minor trap.the cops should not be allowed to use any means but ones that are nessasary to get an answer. All and all they should be able to brake the law if needed.
period 1. comp. 16
i think that the police should follow the rules just like everybody else, because they are citizens also and they shouldn't be able to break the law. they should be able to entrap suspected criminals because if the cops think that they are doing something wrong then they can catch them. I don't think cops should be able to do what ever they want or can to get confessions from criminals because they can either kill them or injure them real badly. It depends what kind of law they are breaking if its something that is going to catch the guys and its the only way then i think its okay, but that doesn't mean that you can do it all the time.
period 1.5
I think the police should follow the same rules as us. Its okay to follow them and catch them in the act because then you have proof. I also think that its okay to entrap suspected criminals because it will keep people safe when they go to jail. Unless its something small like shoplifting. Police shouldn't be able to do whatever it takes because they can torture them and thats never right. Also,the law should never be broken even by police because if we cant do it, they shouldn't be able to either. In conclusion,there are some rules that can be broken but police should be able to do what we do.
2.26 The police should be able to do anything convict a suspect. I think the police shouldn't follow a suspect unless they are convicted because suspects still have rights. I don't think they should be allowed to entrap suspected criminals because they may not be a criminal.I think that the enforcement shouldn't be able to do whatever it takes to get a confession from a suspected criminal.In conclusion, I think that the police shouldn't be able to break the law because the suspected criminals might not be actual criminals.
period 1 computer 20
Police should always act ethically. I don't think it is ethical to convict suspected criminals by any means unless they have proof that the criminal committed the crime. The police should be able to follow suspected but unconvicted criminals to catch them committing other crimes but they should not be able to set them up or frame them for anything. Law enforcement officials should not be able to entrap suspected criminals. They should have to find proof that the criminal committed the crime by them selfs. Cops should not be able to do whatever it takes to get confessions from suspected criminals because the suspect might confess just so they stop even if they didn't do it. in conclusion, the law should not be broken in any way even if it was to make sure that suspected criminals are brought to justice.
1.13
I dont agree with 14 because it could be a miner crime and get hert baddly for it.
Period 1
computer 4
I think the police should always act ethically no matter what the situation is. Because if they overreact when they are arresting people, because if they did something petty the cops would want to beat them or treat them unfairly. I think they shouldn't be able to follow suspected criminals just to see if they are going to commit another crime, they should just arrest them. The police shouldn't be able to do what ever is possible to get confessions out of people. The law should not be broken to catch a suspected criminal they should just do their job.
1.14
Criminals should not get jack because it is their fault so they can suffer the consequences and have no rights and be shot.
1.23
I think the police should act ethical, but we all know they don't! police need to follow laws because they have no sense of right or wrong they do what they want and i hate them all for it. my grandfather ,chuck, is no exception. Police shouldn't be aloud to arrest people they suspect because people they suspect are every teenager around, and anyone in baggy clothes. They really shouldn't allow cops to make some one confess ether since I don't feel like being beat to death for jay walking or asking a cop for his doughnut since we all know they would kill me over something stupid like that. The law could be broken cops do it all the time it just shouldn't be aloud! all in all i hate cops and they need to follow the laws!
1.11-
The cops should be able to use anything they can to convict criminals. The police should be able to follow the criminals that are suspected of crimes they haven't been charged for. Although the police should be able to follow criminals, they shouldn't be allowed to set traps for the criminals to fall into. The police should be allowed to question the perps. but not beat them, or deprive them of food or water. There are, however, some circumstances where the cops should be able to use force. In conclusion the should not be broken to bring a criminal in. If the cops break the law that will only make it seem alright for every day citizens to break the law.
period 1.#6 Well I think that the police should have to follow rules to convict suspected criminals. I think that police should only be able to follow suspected but unconvinced criminals to catch them committing other crimes if that criminal is suspected of murder. Again I only think that police should be able to entrap criminals if they are suspected of murder. The police should only be able to do whatever it takes to get confessions from suspected murderers. In conclusion, I think the law could only be broken to make sure that suspected murderers are brought to justice.
1.12
I disagree with you 14 because criminals have rights to they are humans they are just like the cops but they made mistakes.
period 1 computer 20
i agree with computer 12.
Cops should have to follow the rules just like every one else. They should not have the rights to break the rules just to catch a criminal. The rules weren't just made for fun, they were made for a good reason.
period 1.5
13,
I disagree because if they got to do anything they want with convicted criminals, then they can torture them and stuff and thats not okay.
1.14
I don't agree with 13 because it is their fault so they should suffer the consequences.
24
Yes I think that it is okay for a cop to go to certain extents to catch a suspected criminal. But only for serious crimes the person may have committed. But the downside is that if the person is convicted for a crime he/she didn't do then the person is screwed for life. People may disagree and say that it is not okay for people to break the law to catch someone and they have rights like everyone else. But cops would rather be safe than sorry.
Period 1. #19.
Law enforcement should have to always act ethically. I think that it is unethical to convict suspected criminals by any means.I think that the police should be allowed to follow suspected but unconvinced criminals to catch them other crimes. Law enforcement officials should be able to entrap suspected criminals. The police should be able to do whatever it takes to get confessions from suspected criminals. All in all, I think that it depends on what the crime that was committed is and that depends on the laws police should abide by.
period 1
22
yes i think that cops should do whatever it takes to get the criminals in jail like interrogations
beatings if within reason like only if the perp is resisting arrest or and starts to run but not if its like something stupid for j walking or accidentally runs a red light so all i'm saying is leave the innocents alone and do your job and get the real criminals lazy B******* get of those doughnuts and coffee and get in shape for some of you. quit trying to get any arrest you can because thats how people hate cops like me
1.11-
i agree with number 14 to a point. Depending on what the crime is they should be punished but not just with jail or prison time.
P1.#25
I don't think it is ethical to convict suspected criminals by unnecessary means. Until law enforcement could prove that they had committed the crime, they should be able to let them go. Stalking should be banned, they should just make sure they have their last location on record and move from there. Confessions are the same way, if they don't wanna talk, persuade them, vocally, not abusively. Laws should not be broken to make sure that criminals are brought to justice. In the end, law abiding citizens, or what the police call "suspected criminals", should be let free. They shouldn't fret if they didn't get to put someone in the shocker chair. Anarchy would probably be the better choice in my opinion.
1.23
14 a little harsh criminals are just people who want freedoms and when freedoms are outlawed only outlaws are free so why should they suffer for it.
1.15
It is ethical for police to convict suspected criminals by any means. Police should be able to follow suspected unconvicted criminals to catch that person committing crimes. Police can entrap suspected criminals but they need to have their rights read to them. Police should be able to do what they need to get a confession out of someone, but should only be used in the right cases like if just ran a red light it really shouldn't be necessary. The law should be broken every once and a while, but they should only do it in certain cases.
1.10
It is not ethical to convict suspected criminals by any means. Depending what they are suspected of doing they should not be followed if they have only gotten a misdemeanor. If they are committing a felony the cops should be able to entrap the suspect. No the cops should not be able do whatever they want to get confessions out of people depending on what they have done. No the law cannot be broken so the cops can do whatever they to catch suspected criminals.
1.11-
I disagree with number 19 because the police need restrictions.
1.8
I don't think that the police should be able to follow other people because if they already got out of jail then that's why those people are free. For example in Eric's case putting a trap on him isn't the right thing to do. Proctor should just leave him alone, and if Eric decides to commit another crime then thats his choice. The truth will reveal itself sometime. I don't think the law should be broken to catch another criminal because then it wouldn't be fair because that person that broke the law to catch someone else now has to serve time too. In conclusion think that everyone has the same rights, and cops shouldn't be able to do what they want...
6/7.3 I think that cops are rude an take advantage of there job. They should not be able to suspect people in less they no someone is doing something wrong. They should not be able to do what they want because they take advantage of people. To just get them in trouble. No the law should never be broken because they just get people in trouble.
Post a Comment