2 #4 Yes peoples privacy should be protected because its there life. The press should not tell about people being killed and that the killer is still free. Mainly because it makes people panic and they heart others. I say the press should only be allowed to cover stuff when they are asked to.
No, famous nore infamous people should be able to protect their personal privacy. I believe the media should put their information out, the media already does it to everyday citizens, but the media must have their limits just like everyone else. The media should be regulated in any means possible. I think if regulation hit the fan, the press wont be able to do anything. If the media isn't regulated, the shit wont hit the fan. In Conclusion, anybody shouldn't be able to protect their personal information, just becaus your famous/infamous, it doesn't mean you have beneifits.
Famous people should be able to keep their own privacy because that's just rude to get up in all their bussiness. The media shouldn't be allowed to show anything to anyone because that is their bussines the famous people don't know our bussiness. They should be regulated like they should only put good things out there they shouldn't say all of the bad stuff. I think that the press should just leave them alone. What would happen if they werent regulated? the famous people would go crazy. Getting into the lives of other people has no good purpose at all its just stupid.
I think who famous people should have their own personal privacy. They should have their own privacy because some people that are not famous have already done it but most of the time it's not on the news. The media should show some things that seem Ok, but they they shouldn't show they love live unless they want to make it into a serse. I think that the media doesn't have a limit because I won't really care if a famous person has a party for Thanksgiving. If the media isn't regulated then it will be a free for all about anything they do in their house or to witch resturant they go to. I think that the public should have a little access to some of their life to famous just to keep up with what they do.
2/3.15ya they should with out anyone saying anythang.like where they were where there next show is and like if ppl get in trouble i guess,but wat they shouldn`t be able to show would be like who are they with and what they do everyday if they lose weight of stuff like that.You take it to a court then it will be desided.It proble would matter but some stuff you can`t share.Ya i guess it dose in a way but not really
People who are famous or infamous should be allowed to keep to maintain their own personal privacy. I think that the media could show the world when famous people has a couple or is getting married or things that are not important to the famous person who the media is talking about. The off limits should be like their personal things in there life like if someone died or the are doing drugs abused or something like that, that won't embarrassed there self. The media can shouldn't be posting things that don't concerned about them because its breaking one of the ammendment of the constitution. Its going against the rights of free speech and freedom of the press in the constitution says you shouldn't post things to world without asking the person whom they might be talking about. If the media isn't regulated things could go bad and people would probably get there feeling hurt in anyway. Surely, if the public access to live of famous or infamous like (Eric) would probably be a good purpose because he killed someone and they are just trying to tell people to watch for out for themself.
I disagree with 15, 3, 21, and 4. Nobody has benefits in this world. Everybody, rather you like it or not, we are all of the media. I mean, the government can even listen to our phone calls for crying out loud.
I think famous and infamous people should protect their privacy. The media shouldn't show anything they are just like us. I don't know how the the media be regulated. No we have freedom of speech and i don't know about freedom of press. a lot things could be happening if the media isn't regulated. The public should not have access to the lives of the famous/ infamous people because it is annoying to them just bug off of them
2/3 computer #17 People who are famous should be allowed to maintain their privacy. The media should only be able to see things that aren't personal because I wouldn't want someone to be all up in my business. They shouldn't be able to see things behind closed doors it's none of their business. The media should be regulated by having a certain point they cant pass. No, because I think they shouldn't even be able to be doing the things they do. If the media isn't regulated I think they will get out of hand. In conclusion, the public access doesn't serve any good purpose because it just starts drama.
People who are famous should be able to keep their own privacy. They shouldnt be allowed to talk about their private lives. By only being able to show certain things to the public. Then famous people would have their lives ruined by the press. In conclusion, public access to famous peoples lives does not have any good purpose.
2/3. Computer#14 I think famous people or infamous people should be able to protect there privacy, I think that the media Shouldn't just post things like they normally do, the media should post important things instead of just point less drama. I think that the famous and infamous people think that eric dose not serve a good purpose it makes people wonder and its like a mystery to see if he'll get out or not. I don't think that the media should show personal things. If the media was not regulated it would be out of control because nobody would be telling them anything, i mean nobody would be telling them they cant do this or they cant do that they could just do what ever they want. I don't think there are any rights and infringe upon the rights or freedom amoung the press because it seems like the press dose not have any regulation. In conclusion i think the media should not post personal things about people that people don't want them to post.
2/3 #3 I have to disagree with computer #19 because we don't want to know everything they do. People do deserve their own privacy even if it's some thing that isn't important to them.
I think famous or infamous people shuld be able to protect there privacy. The media should only be allowed to show certain stuff like there name etc. Things they shouldnt show are personal information about them. the media could be regulated by anything i don't know. Yes it would infringe the fee speech rights and freedom of the press. The wourld could have world wide acess to almost everything. Yes because it lets us know a little more about them but it also can be a bad thing to.
I think famous or infamous people shuld be able to protect there privacy. The media should only be allowed to show certain stuff like there name etc. Things they shouldnt show are personal information about them. the media could be regulated by anything i don't know. Yes it would infringe the fee speech rights and freedom of the press. The wourld could have world wide acess to almost everything. Yes because it lets us know a little more about them but it also can be a bad thing to.
I agree with #1. The press should leave them alone! We are all people right? Just because they can sing or what ever doesn't make them different from people.
Yes i believe that people famous or infamous should be able to protect there privacy i mean if we would not wan the presidents information sent out all over the world why would we want the people who put him there.I believe that the media should only show what you want the to see off limits i think would be anything not given in written approbation. Honestly i don't think there is a way to regulate any other way than to just set a certain set of rules. I see most people would think it is invading on peoples rights, but it is no different than them invading yours without permission. I would say that the media would keep going the same way it is now just gets worse and worse. i think certain things that the people would have to know would be necessary.
32 comments:
2 #4
Yes peoples privacy should be protected because its there life. The press should not tell about people being killed and that the killer is still free. Mainly because it makes people panic and they heart others. I say the press should only be allowed to cover stuff when they are asked to.
comp 19
2/3/10
No, famous nore infamous people should be able to protect their personal privacy. I believe the media should put their information out, the media already does it to everyday citizens, but the media must have their limits just like everyone else. The media should be regulated in any means possible. I think if regulation hit the fan, the press wont be able to do anything. If the media isn't regulated, the shit wont hit the fan. In Conclusion, anybody shouldn't be able to protect their personal information, just becaus your famous/infamous, it doesn't mean you have beneifits.
2/3.21
Famous people should be able to keep their own privacy because that's just rude to get up in all their bussiness. The media shouldn't be allowed to show anything to anyone because that is their bussines the famous people don't know our bussiness. They should be regulated like they should only put good things out there they shouldn't say all of the bad stuff. I think that the press should just leave them alone. What would happen if they werent regulated? the famous people would go crazy. Getting into the lives of other people has no good purpose at all its just stupid.
2/3 #3
I think who famous people should have their own personal privacy. They should have their own privacy because some people that are not famous have already done it but most of the time it's not on the news. The media should show some things that seem Ok, but they they shouldn't show they love live unless they want to make it into a serse. I think that the media doesn't have a limit because I won't really care if a famous person has a party for Thanksgiving. If the media isn't regulated then it will be a free for all about anything they do in their house or to witch resturant they go to. I think that the public should have a little access to some of their life to famous just to keep up with what they do.
2/3.15ya they should with out anyone saying anythang.like where they were where there next show is and like if ppl get in trouble i guess,but wat they shouldn`t be able to show would be like who are they with and what they do everyday if they lose weight of stuff like that.You take it to a court then it will be desided.It proble would matter but some stuff you can`t share.Ya i guess it dose in a way but not really
2 #4
I agree with 21 because famous people dont care about us and we should not care about them.
2/3 #3
I have to agree with everything that computer #4 has said because some people will want to know if that person is not near where they live.
2/3.21
I disagree with 19 I don't think that the media has the right to get up in their busssiness.
period: two, computer: eiqht(=
People who are famous or infamous should be allowed to keep to maintain their own personal privacy. I think that the media could show the world when famous people has a couple or is getting married or things that are not important to the famous person who the media is talking about. The off limits should be like their personal things in there life like if someone died or the are doing drugs abused or something like that, that won't embarrassed there self. The media can shouldn't be posting things that don't concerned about them because its breaking one of the ammendment of the constitution. Its going against the rights of free speech and freedom of the press in the constitution says you shouldn't post things to world without asking the person whom they might be talking about. If the media isn't regulated things could go bad and people would probably get there feeling hurt in anyway. Surely, if the public access to live of famous or infamous like (Eric) would probably be a good purpose because he killed someone and they are just trying to tell people to watch for out for themself.
2/3.15
number 21 i think ppl should have there own privacy for they can live there life
comp-19
2-3
I disagree with 15, 3, 21, and 4. Nobody has benefits in this world. Everybody, rather you like it or not, we are all of the media. I mean, the government can even listen to our phone calls for crying out loud.
#1 2/3
I think famous and infamous people should protect their privacy. The media shouldn't show anything they are just like us. I don't know how the the media be regulated. No we have freedom of speech and i don't know about freedom of press. a lot things could be happening if the media isn't regulated. The public should not have access to the lives of the famous/ infamous people because it is annoying to them just bug off of them
2/3
computer #17
People who are famous should be allowed to maintain their privacy. The media should only be able to see things that aren't personal because I wouldn't want someone to be all up in my business. They shouldn't be able to see things behind closed doors it's none of their business. The media should be regulated by having a certain point they cant pass. No, because I think they shouldn't even be able to be doing the things they do. If the media isn't regulated I think they will get out of hand. In conclusion, the public access doesn't serve any good purpose because it just starts drama.
2/3.7
People who are famous should be able to keep their own privacy. They shouldnt be allowed to talk about their private lives. By only being able to show certain things to the public. Then famous people would have their lives ruined by the press. In conclusion, public access to famous peoples lives does not have any good purpose.
2/3. Computer#14
I think famous people or infamous people should be able to protect there privacy, I think that the media Shouldn't just post things like they normally do, the media should post important things instead of just point less drama. I think that the famous and infamous people think that eric dose not serve a good purpose it makes people wonder and its like a mystery to see if he'll get out or not. I don't think that the media should show personal things. If the media was not regulated it would be out of control because nobody would be telling them anything, i mean nobody would be telling them they cant do this or they cant do that they could just do what ever they want. I don't think there are any rights and infringe upon the rights or freedom amoung the press because it seems like the press dose not have any regulation. In conclusion i think the media should not post personal things about people that people don't want them to post.
2/3 #3
I have to disagree with computer #19 because we don't want to know everything they do. People do deserve their own privacy even if it's some thing that isn't important to them.
2/3.15
i agree with number 4 just cause ppl should be able to tell who they want to about someone that was killed in there family
P:2/3. Computer:10
I think that famous people should not get personal privacy. If their going to be famous they got to get use to all the paparazzi's and all the fans.
period2/3.comp9
I think famous or infamous people shuld be able to protect there privacy. The media should only be allowed to show certain stuff like there name etc. Things they shouldnt show are personal information about them. the media could be regulated by anything i don't know. Yes it would infringe the fee speech rights and freedom of the press. The wourld could have world wide acess to almost everything. Yes because it lets us know a little more about them but it also can be a bad thing to.
2 #4
I agree with 17 because some people dont want stuff to get out and the media dose not care who they heart, just as long as they get paid for it.
2/321
ok 19 you have a sister i know you do. Don't you hate when she just walks in your room when you want your privacy.???????!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
period:two, computer:eiqht<3
I agree with number twenty-one the media should stay out of famous people business because it is rude.
period2/3.comp9
I think famous or infamous people shuld be able to protect there privacy. The media should only be allowed to show certain stuff like there name etc. Things they shouldnt show are personal information about them. the media could be regulated by anything i don't know. Yes it would infringe the fee speech rights and freedom of the press. The wourld could have world wide acess to almost everything. Yes because it lets us know a little more about them but it also can be a bad thing to.
P:2/3. Computer:10
I don't agree #4. They should get use to all the fans and paparazzi's.
2/3.#14
I agree with #3 because you have a point we don't want to know everything they do and people do deserve there own privacy everybody dose.
P:2/3. Computer#:10
I kinda agree with you #8. Non famous people should get their own privacy.
2/3
computer #17
I agree with #1. The press should leave them alone! We are all people right? Just because they can sing or what ever doesn't make them different from people.
period:two, computer:eiqht("
I agree with number seventeen famous peoples should maintain with there own privacy and the media should leave them alone.
#5 2/3
I think famous people should have personal privacy because everyone should have some privacy.
2/3#20
==fly guy==
Yes i believe that people famous or infamous should be able to protect there privacy i mean if we would not wan the presidents information sent out all over the world why would we want the people who put him there.I believe that the media should only show what you want the to see off limits i think would be anything not given in written approbation. Honestly i don't think there is a way to regulate any other way than to just set a certain set of rules. I see most people would think it is invading on peoples rights, but it is no different than them invading yours without permission. I would say that the media would keep going the same way it is now just gets worse and worse. i think certain things that the people would have to know would be necessary.
i agree with you 5 my thoughts are not much diffrent
2/3.#18
I agree with #8 because people should have their privacy.Its wack if you dont.
Post a Comment