Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Period 1
Read the questions below and click "comments" to respond here in a well-written paragraph of at least five sentences.
Period 2
Read the questions below and click "comments" to respond here in a well-written paragraph of at least five sentences.
Period 4
Read the questions below and click "comments" to respond here in a well-written paragraph of at least five sentences.
Period 5
Read the questions below and click "comments" to respond here in a well-written paragraph of at least five sentences.
Period 6
Read the questions below and click "comments" to respond here in a well-written paragraph of at least five sentences.
Should we listen to ignorant people?
Answer the following questions while keeping these points in mind:
•Write at least five sentences in paragraph form with a good topic sentence and a good conclusion.
•Use standard punctuation, spelling, and school-appropriate language.
•Use details from To Kill a Mockingbird--and details from your own experience--to support your answer.
Is it okay to accept the viewpoints of ignorant people? Should racist or hateful ideas simply be accepted and/or ignored? Is it better just to let people think and say whatever they want without confronting ignorance? Why might acceptance be either a good or a bad idea? Does ignoring ignorance validate it and/or guarantee that it will continue? Does confronting it guarantee that it will stop? How can ignorant people be educated or is this even possible? How can the spread of ignorance be prevented?
•Write at least five sentences in paragraph form with a good topic sentence and a good conclusion.
•Use standard punctuation, spelling, and school-appropriate language.
•Use details from To Kill a Mockingbird--and details from your own experience--to support your answer.
Is it okay to accept the viewpoints of ignorant people? Should racist or hateful ideas simply be accepted and/or ignored? Is it better just to let people think and say whatever they want without confronting ignorance? Why might acceptance be either a good or a bad idea? Does ignoring ignorance validate it and/or guarantee that it will continue? Does confronting it guarantee that it will stop? How can ignorant people be educated or is this even possible? How can the spread of ignorance be prevented?
Wednesday, November 2, 2011
Period 1
Read the questions below and click "comments" to respond here in a well-written paragraph of at least five sentences.
Period 2
Read the questions below and click "comments" to respond here in a well-written paragraph of at least five sentences.
Period 4
Read the questions below and click "comments" to respond here in a well-written paragraph of at least five sentences.
Period 5
Read the questions below and click "comments" to respond here in a well-written paragraph of at least five sentences.
Period 6
Read the questions below and click "comments" to respond here in a well-written paragraph of at least five sentences.
Should rape victims testify?
Answer the following questions while keeping these points in mind:
•Write at least five sentences in paragraph form with a good topic sentence and a good conclusion.
•Use standard punctuation, spelling, and school-appropriate language.
•Use details from To Kill a Mockingbird--and details from your own experience--to support your answer.
Should rape victims testify against their attackers in court? Is it cruel to force these victims to relive the trauma they suffered? Is keeping them from testifying denying them the right to confront their accusers? Could shielding them from defense cross-examination prevent crucial details from coming to light (being discovered)? In other words, could sheilding these victims from questioning be unfair to the accused attackers as well? Should rape victims be treated differently because of the nature of the crime?
•Write at least five sentences in paragraph form with a good topic sentence and a good conclusion.
•Use standard punctuation, spelling, and school-appropriate language.
•Use details from To Kill a Mockingbird--and details from your own experience--to support your answer.
Should rape victims testify against their attackers in court? Is it cruel to force these victims to relive the trauma they suffered? Is keeping them from testifying denying them the right to confront their accusers? Could shielding them from defense cross-examination prevent crucial details from coming to light (being discovered)? In other words, could sheilding these victims from questioning be unfair to the accused attackers as well? Should rape victims be treated differently because of the nature of the crime?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)