Read the questions below and click "comments" to respond here in a well-written paragraph ofat leastfive sentences.
25 comments:
Anonymous
said...
4.5 I understand that the police have to have data to back them up. The cop need to get him in the act. The rights of people should be the way that they treat others. Law are made to protect everyone. All and all people have right and police are people too.
5.14 I think that the police should be able to do whatever they need to in able to keep other people safe! Then again the police should have some boundaries, because they should not be able to do unnecessary things to people like beat them or hurt them in anyway unless the criminal does some thing to in danger them. All in all I don't believe that the law should be broken by police, because if people can't break laws neither should the police!
5.27 I believe that police officers shouldn't be able to commit criminals by setting them up. My opinion is that it is unfair to set up people to catch them to do something wrong. A law enforcement officials should not be able to entrap suspected criminals because they also have a life they could check in on them but not follow them. A police officers should not do what ever it takes to get any confessions from the convicted/ suspected criminal(s). The law should not be able to break the laws to make sure that the suspected criminals are brought to justice, because they never know if they break the wrong law. In conclusion, I believe that criminals shouldn't be followed to be convicted, and officers shouldn't break the law to put the convicted criminal away.
5.24 Yes they should follow the rules but not by any means. No the police should not be able to follow him because the criminal has already done his/her time. The cops shouldn't be aloud to do that because they would have to endanger an innocent civilian. Yes and no, they should be able to do somethings but not brutally beat them or starve them. In conclusion, the law can be broken but only in cases that it needs to be, such as terrorism, or trying to murder somebody important.
Would you like to be convected for something you didn't do? I don't think that it's ethical to convict suspected criminals by any means. Police can follow suspects, but not to set up traps. I don't believe in whatever it takes to get a confession from suspected criminal. I am sure that the law can be broken under certain circumstances, like that those that endanger the whole county. In conclusion, it is not ethical to convict by any means.
5.28 I think it is ethical for police to convict suspected criminal. No, police should just follow suspected criminal to catch them committing other crimes. Law enforcement officials should be able to do entrap suspected criminals. They shouldn't be able to do whatever to a criminal just to make them talk. The law should do what ever they can to make sure that suspected criminals are brought to justice.
5.18 I think it is ethical at times to convict suspected criminals by any means. The police shouldn't be able to follow suspected but unconvicted criminals to catch them committing other crimes. Law enforcement should not be able to do entrap suspected criminals. The police should not do whatever it takes to get confessions from suspected criminals. The law can be broken to make sure that suspected criminals are brought to justice. In conclusion, law enforcement should be ethical at times when it is right.
I think it's not ethical because you never know if the person is accused of a crime or if they or innocent or guilty of a crime. It's not right to make your own laws due to being illegal. It's right to obey the law. If you have a boyfriend or girlfriend that has been convicted of a crime it's best if you didn't date that man/woman who's been in jail. Obeying the law means to do what's asked of you and it also mean the cops shouldn't be ethical anyway. It makes me think of racism. If cops are ethical it should be against the law because ethic is important to a citizen of a certain country. Like China, or India, or even the Philippines or even Russia. Every person has their own kind of ethnicity.
5.11 I think the police should act ethically. But they should not be able to tell other people they will lower there time in jail to try to catch Erin. I don't think they should do any thing to catch him/her but they should follow them and see what they are up to sometimes. That is why I don't think the law should be broken so they can catch a criminal. All in All that is what I think they should and shouldn't do to catch a criminal.
5.28 No it's not very ethical to convict suspected criminals, I say this because you need to know if someone is guilty or not. No they should not be able to because even if they are suspected criminals they should be able to have privacy. No the should not be able to entrap suspected criminals because they don't know if they are guilty or not they are simply going off a hunch.No they should not be able to do whatever they want to get confessions because they could be torturing someone who is not guilty. It could be but it shouldn't be it's just simply unethical and not right in anyway! All in all I believe suspected criminals should have some privacy and the law shouldn't be broken no matter what.
Would you like to be convected for something you didn't do? I don't think that it's ethical to convict suspected criminals by any means. Police can follow suspects, but not to set up traps. I don't believe in whatever it takes to get a confession from suspected criminal. I am sure that the law can be broken under certain circumstances, like that those that endanger the whole county. In conclusion, it is not ethical to convict by any means.
Would you like to be convected for something you didn't do? I don't think that it's ethical to convict suspected criminals by any means. Police can follow suspects, but not to set up traps. I don't believe in whatever it takes to get a confession from suspected criminal. I am sure that the law can be broken under certain circumstances, like that those that endanger the whole county. In conclusion, it is not ethical to convict by any means.
5.#29 No, i think that it is not ethical to convict suspected criminals by any means depending on the criminal. I think that both yes and no that the police should be able to follow suspected criminals and unconvinced criminals to catch them committing other crimes. I think this because it could be unfair to the ones who already did their times, but if the police feels that they're up to something then they would have a good to be suspecting things. Yes, the law enforcement officials should be able to entrap suspected criminals, that reason being for the community's safety if they might be up to something. No, the police should not be able to do what ever it takes to get confessions from suspected criminals, because they might not have done what the police thinks they did. No, the should never brake the law to make sure that the suspected criminals are brought to justice, because that might be far to the person being charged!
To:5.14 From:5.28 I do agree with you about the boundaries for police. If citizens aren't suppose to break laws, neither should police be able to do it because they are citizens as well.
I think that a police should act ethically.On the other hand, police man should not entrap suspected criminals, i think of this because it's against the law and the police men should obey their laws. I also think that officers should not do whatever they want to a suspected criminal to confess. For example, those police officers who beat a person up just to confess.In conclusion, the police should act ethically, and they should not be abusive to force the criminal.
5.14 I agree with the person who said ">:P Thats evil i would never do that, not letting people get food or water. Kinda evil i say but thats just me. Anyway equal rights for all!!!!!!", because you are taking the rights they have as a human which isn't very fair!
5.10 I think you should have a good reason to suspect people as criminals. I dont think cops should be able to follow any one unless the cop knows they did some thing wrong. I think cops should not be able to trap suspects.i dont think cops can do what ever to get an answer from some one. I dont think the law should ever be able to break the law.
5.#16 No,it isn't ethical for a police officer to respond to a convict in any way. The only way a police officer to lay or take physcial actions if the convict threatens the police officer. It all depends what the convict is getting tracked down for. If is serious then yes, the police officers should track the convict down and put him/her in jail. In order for a police officer to entrap all depends on what the convict did but, I believe if the convict has or did a horrible crime then the police officers should defiently entrap them. No, the police officer shouln't do whatever it takes to make the convict confess because just becauise there in doesn't really mean they did it and you need proof before you do any harm to the convict. But, I don't think the police offier should lay a hand on the convict unless thretened. No, the law should never be broken just to bring down a convict, If your a person who wants to obey the law then the police offier shouldn't go over and beyond to get what they want. They should just go by the law! In conclusion, I believe police officers should follow the laws but do try and get the convicts!
I think all people should be treated the same whether people are in their one kind of ethnicity. The cops shouldn't be so racist at times because some people can be arrested because of their race. Hitler was like that. He would kill someone with blond hair blue eyes an example like that. It's unfair to those who are arrested due to their skin color. It's not fair one bit because people getting deported and getting arrested due to skin color is really sad. Cops shouldn't be so ethical because it's rude.
5.12 I dont think it is ethical to convict criminals by any means. The law can not bent just so some one can cach a criminal. I dont think the police should fallow the crimials arownd because is would be agenst ther freedom.
25 comments:
4.5 I understand that the police have to have data to back them up. The cop need to get him in the act. The rights of people should be the way that they treat others. Law are made to protect everyone. All and all people have right and police are people too.
5.14
I think that the police should be able to do whatever they need to in able to keep other people safe! Then again the police should have some boundaries, because they should not be able to do unnecessary things to people like beat them or hurt them in anyway unless the criminal does some thing to in danger them. All in all I don't believe that the law should be broken by police, because if people can't break laws neither should the police!
5.27
I believe that police officers shouldn't be able to commit criminals by setting them up. My opinion is that it is unfair to set up people to catch them to do something wrong. A law enforcement officials should not be able to entrap suspected criminals because they also have a life they could check in on them but not follow them. A police officers should not do what ever it takes to get any confessions from the convicted/ suspected criminal(s). The law should not be able to break the laws to make sure that the suspected criminals are brought to justice, because they never know if they break the wrong law. In conclusion, I believe that criminals shouldn't be followed to be convicted, and officers shouldn't break the law to put the convicted criminal away.
5.24 Yes they should follow the rules but not by any means. No the police should not be able to follow him because the criminal has already done his/her time. The cops shouldn't be aloud to do that because they would have to endanger an innocent civilian. Yes and no, they should be able to do somethings but not brutally beat them or starve them. In conclusion, the law can be broken but only in cases that it needs to be, such as terrorism, or trying to murder somebody important.
5.21
Would you like to be convected for something you didn't do? I don't think that it's ethical to convict suspected criminals by any means. Police can follow suspects, but not to set up traps. I don't believe in whatever it takes to get a confession from suspected criminal. I am sure that the law can be broken under certain circumstances, like that those that endanger the whole county. In conclusion, it is not ethical to convict by any means.
5.14
Dear #4 I agree you when you said "people have right and police are people too." because they are and everyone should be treated the same!
5.28
I think it is ethical for police to convict suspected criminal. No, police should just follow suspected criminal to catch them committing other crimes. Law enforcement officials should be able to do entrap suspected criminals. They shouldn't be able to do whatever to a criminal just to make them talk. The law should do what ever they can to make sure that suspected criminals are brought to justice.
5.18
I think it is ethical at times to convict suspected criminals by any means. The police shouldn't be able to follow suspected but unconvicted criminals to catch them committing other crimes. Law enforcement should not be able to do entrap suspected criminals. The police should not do whatever it takes to get confessions from suspected criminals. The law can be broken to make sure that suspected criminals are brought to justice. In conclusion, law enforcement should be ethical at times when it is right.
5.19 >:P Thats evil i would never do that, not letting people get food or water. Kinda evil i say but thats just me. Anyway equal rights for all!!!!!!
5.#2
I think it's not ethical because you never know if the person is accused of a crime or if they or innocent or guilty of a crime. It's not right to make your own laws due to being illegal. It's right to obey the law. If you have a boyfriend or girlfriend that has been convicted of a crime it's best if you didn't date that man/woman who's been in jail. Obeying the law means to do what's asked of you and it also mean the cops shouldn't be ethical anyway. It makes me think of racism. If cops are ethical it should be against the law because ethic is important to a citizen of a certain country. Like China, or India, or even the Philippines or even Russia. Every person has their own kind of ethnicity.
4.5 number 27 you have a good idea about the people who breaks the laws.
5.11 I think the police should act ethically. But they should not be able to tell other people they will lower there time in jail to try to catch Erin. I don't think they should do any thing to catch him/her but they should follow them and see what they are up to sometimes. That is why I don't think the law should be broken so they can catch a criminal. All in All that is what I think they should and shouldn't do to catch a criminal.
5.28
No it's not very ethical to convict suspected criminals, I say this because you need to know if someone is guilty or not. No they should not be able to because even if they are suspected criminals they should be able to have privacy. No the should not be able to entrap suspected criminals because they don't know if they are guilty or not they are simply going off a hunch.No they should not be able to do whatever they want to get confessions because they could be torturing someone who is not guilty. It could be but it shouldn't be it's just simply unethical and not right in anyway! All in all I believe suspected criminals should have some privacy and the law shouldn't be broken no matter what.
5.21
Would you like to be convected for something you didn't do? I don't think that it's ethical to convict suspected criminals by any means. Police can follow suspects, but not to set up traps. I don't believe in whatever it takes to get a confession from suspected criminal. I am sure that the law can be broken under certain circumstances, like that those that endanger the whole county. In conclusion, it is not ethical to convict by any means.
5.21
Would you like to be convected for something you didn't do? I don't think that it's ethical to convict suspected criminals by any means. Police can follow suspects, but not to set up traps. I don't believe in whatever it takes to get a confession from suspected criminal. I am sure that the law can be broken under certain circumstances, like that those that endanger the whole county. In conclusion, it is not ethical to convict by any means.
5.18
I agree with 5.14. The police should do what they can to keep the people safe!, yet the police should not break the law to bring justice.
5.#29
No, i think that it is not ethical to convict suspected criminals by any means depending on the criminal. I think that both yes and no that the police should be able to follow suspected criminals and unconvinced criminals to catch them committing other crimes. I think this because it could be unfair to the ones who already did their times, but if the police feels that they're up to something then they would have a good to be suspecting things. Yes, the law enforcement officials should be able to entrap suspected criminals, that reason being for the community's safety if they might be up to something. No, the police should not be able to do what ever it takes to get confessions from suspected criminals, because they might not have done what the police thinks they did. No, the should never brake the law to make sure that the suspected criminals are brought to justice, because that might be far to the person being charged!
5.18
I agree with 5.19. There should be equal rights for all!
To:5.14
From:5.28
I do agree with you about the boundaries for police. If citizens aren't suppose to break laws, neither should police be able to do it because they are citizens as well.
5. 7
I think that a police should act ethically.On the other hand, police man should not entrap suspected criminals, i think of this because it's against the law and the police men should obey their laws. I also think that officers should not do whatever they want to a suspected criminal to confess. For example, those police officers who beat a person up just to confess.In conclusion, the police should act ethically, and they should not be abusive to force the criminal.
5.14
I agree with the person who said ">:P Thats evil i would never do that, not letting people get food or water. Kinda evil i say but thats just me. Anyway equal rights for all!!!!!!", because you are taking the rights they have as a human which isn't very fair!
5.10 I think you should have a good reason to suspect people as criminals. I dont think cops should be able to follow any one unless the cop knows they did some thing wrong. I think cops should not be able to trap suspects.i dont think cops can do what ever to get an answer from some one. I dont think the law should ever be able to break the law.
5.#16
No,it isn't ethical for a police officer to respond to a convict in any way. The only way a police officer to lay or take physcial actions if the convict threatens the police officer. It all depends what the convict is getting tracked down for. If is serious then yes, the police officers should track the convict down and put him/her in jail. In order for a police officer to entrap all depends on what the convict did but, I believe if the convict has or did a horrible crime then the police officers should defiently entrap them. No, the police officer shouln't do whatever it takes to make the convict confess because just becauise there in doesn't really mean they did it and you need proof before you do any harm to the convict. But, I don't think the police offier should lay a hand on the convict unless thretened. No, the law should never be broken just to bring down a convict, If your a person who wants to obey the law then the police offier shouldn't go over and beyond to get what they want. They should just go by the law! In conclusion, I believe police officers should follow the laws but do try and get the convicts!
5.#2
I think all people should be treated the same whether people are in their one kind of ethnicity. The cops shouldn't be so racist at times because some people can be arrested because of their race. Hitler was like that. He would kill someone with blond hair blue eyes an example like that. It's unfair to those who are arrested due to their skin color.
It's not fair one bit because people getting deported and getting arrested due to skin color is really sad. Cops shouldn't be so ethical because it's rude.
5.12 I dont think it is ethical to convict criminals by any means. The law can not bent just so some one can cach a criminal. I dont think the police should fallow the crimials arownd because is would be agenst ther freedom.
Post a Comment