Read the questions below and click "comments" to respond here in a well-written paragraph ofat leastfive sentences.
14 comments:
Anonymous
said...
2. 29 Police should not be able to commit certin crimes just to convict SUSPECTED criminals. it violates human rights for police to be given extra athority. this would corrupt police. It is not fair for criminals to be treated differently even after they have served their time. everyone makes mistakes. Even police are people. Police hold grudges, vengence, have anger, so we can not give them any extra athority.
2.28 I think it is ethical to convict suspected criminals by any means. Police should not be able to follow suspected unconvicted criminals. Law enforcement officials should not be able to entrap suspected criminals. Police mshould not be able to do whatever it takes. I think it is stupid to break the law to catch people and put them in jail.
2.8 I believe that police should follow certain ethics like not taking food from people not beating people when they surrender not shooting a baby that sort of thing.
27 I think that cops should do what they need if it is serious. Like if you got caught stealing gum then they should not tackle you to the ground and arrest you. Also if you have murdered someone I think they should shoot you right then and there. But I think they should have to follow the rules and just like anyone else they should get in trouble if they don't. Therefore, I believe that cops are like anyone else and should be punished for there bad doings.
2.19 I believe it depends on the crime for police to convict suspected criminals. Police should be allowed to fallow unconvicted criminals to watch and see what they are doing.Entrapping suspected criminals should be allowed. Police should be limited on what they do to try to get criminals to confess. I don't think the law should be broken to bring suspected criminals to justice. In conclusion, suspected criminals shouldn't be treated badly just to prove they are guilty.
The cop's Should but out. You are innocent until proven guilty. When your not proven guilty they should not tempt you. There nothing more than nosy meddlers.
2.16 It is ethical to convict suspected criminals. The police should NOT be able to follow unconvicted criminals to catch them committing crimes. The law enforcement is stupid if they hold criminals entrap. They shouldnot be able to get confessions of suspected criminals. The police, I think shouldnt break the law just because they have a badge on. We cant so they cant. Clearly, you see that I disagree with most of the rules and such that the goverment would have.
2.1I think that police should not be able to follow suspected and unconvicted criminals to catch them because that's not letting them have their own privacy.I also think that law enforce officials should not be able to to entrap criminals because that's just no right. In conclusion i think that police officers shouldn't be able to keep an eye on the suspects after they are released.
2.24 it's not ethical to convict suspected criminals by any means. But they should be able to follow suspected but unconvicted criminals to catch them committing other crimes. they also shouldn't be able to entrap suspected criminals. Neither should should they be able to do whatever it takes to get confession from suspected criminals. In conclusion, the law shouldn't be broken to make sure that suspected criminals are brought to justice.
Yes I think that it is ethical to convict suspects.I think that the police should be able to follow suspected people because they need to find these kind of people. No I don't think that the law enforcement should entrap suspected criminals. No i really don't think that they should be able to confess to other suspects. Clearly, think that the law can be broken to bring criminals to justice.
2.5 Yes and no to convict suspected criminals because some might be innocent and telling the truth. Yes they should be able to follow them because they might do something bad again and cause more pain to others. If they are about to do some thing then the cops could stop them before they do it. Yes they should because the criminal should pay for what they did. Yes because criminals need to stop getting away with the things they do to hurt other people.
2.17-I think it is ethical to convict suspected criminals by any means because the police don't know if the person is an actual criminal so they should use all of the laws they can to catch the person.I think that the police should be able to follow the people to watch them doing other crimes.The cops should not be aloud to set traps for suspected for anything.
14 comments:
2. 29 Police should not be able to commit certin crimes just to convict SUSPECTED criminals. it violates human rights for police to be given extra athority. this would corrupt police. It is not fair for criminals to be treated differently even after they have served their time. everyone makes mistakes. Even police are people. Police hold grudges, vengence, have anger, so we can not give them any extra athority.
2.28 I think it is ethical to convict suspected criminals by any means. Police should not be able to follow suspected unconvicted criminals. Law enforcement officials should not be able to entrap suspected criminals. Police mshould not be able to do whatever it takes. I think it is stupid to break the law to catch people and put them in jail.
2.8 I believe that police should follow certain ethics like not taking food from people not beating people when they surrender not shooting a baby that sort of thing.
27 I think that cops should do what they need if it is serious. Like if you got caught stealing gum then they should not tackle you to the ground and arrest you. Also if you have murdered someone I think they should shoot you right then and there. But I think they should have to follow the rules and just like anyone else they should get in trouble if they don't. Therefore, I believe that cops are like anyone else and should be punished for there bad doings.
2.19
I believe it depends on the crime for police to convict suspected criminals. Police should be allowed to fallow unconvicted criminals to watch and see what they are doing.Entrapping suspected criminals should be allowed. Police should be limited on what they do to try to get criminals to confess. I don't think the law should be broken to bring suspected criminals to justice. In conclusion, suspected criminals shouldn't be treated badly just to prove they are guilty.
2.28 to 2.29 I agree with you if police break the law than people will break the law too. So they shouldn't break it.
2:11
The cop's Should but out. You are innocent until proven guilty. When your not proven guilty they should not tempt you. There nothing more than nosy meddlers.
2.16
It is ethical to convict suspected criminals. The police should NOT be able to follow unconvicted criminals to catch them committing crimes. The law enforcement is stupid if they hold criminals entrap. They shouldnot be able to get confessions of suspected criminals. The police, I think shouldnt break the law just because they have a badge on. We cant so they cant. Clearly, you see that I disagree with most of the rules and such that the goverment would have.
2.28 to 2.8 I don't agree with you because police are citizens to and should not break the law.
2.1I think that police should not be able to follow suspected and unconvicted criminals to catch them because that's not letting them have their own privacy.I also think that law enforce officials should not be able to to entrap criminals because that's just no right. In conclusion i think that police officers shouldn't be able to keep an eye on the suspects after they are released.
2.24 it's not ethical to convict suspected criminals by any means. But they should be able to follow suspected but unconvicted criminals to catch them committing other crimes. they also shouldn't be able to entrap suspected criminals. Neither should should they be able to do whatever it takes to get confession from suspected criminals. In conclusion, the law shouldn't be broken to make sure that suspected criminals are brought to justice.
2.#9
Yes I think that it is ethical to convict suspects.I think that the police should be able to follow suspected people because they need to find these kind of people. No I don't think that the law enforcement should entrap suspected criminals. No i really don't think that they should be able to confess to other suspects. Clearly, think that the law can be broken to bring criminals to justice.
2.5
Yes and no to convict suspected criminals because some might be innocent and telling the truth. Yes they should be able to follow them because they might do something bad again and cause more pain to others. If they are about to do some thing then the cops could stop them before they do it. Yes they should because the criminal should pay for what they did. Yes because criminals need to stop getting away with the things they do to hurt other people.
2.17-I think it is ethical to convict suspected criminals by any means because the police don't know if the person is an actual criminal so they should use all of the laws they can to catch the person.I think that the police should be able to follow the people to watch them doing other crimes.The cops should not be aloud to set traps for suspected for anything.
Post a Comment