Read the questions below and click "comments" to respond here in a well-written paragraph ofat leastfive sentences.
61 comments:
Anonymous
said...
1.24 I think that famous people should get privacy for their personal life. I think the media should be able to know about their personal life if they would like to share it, but with their carrier life I think we should be able to know about when a big show or movie is coming out etc. I think maybe the media should be able to get updates on celebs once or twice a month. Yes, regulating would infringe on the freedom speech and the press. If the media isn't regulated it's going to get out of control to where everyday just like now there's updates on everyone. I think it's kind of pointless to have access of the lives of famous people because, a lot of the things that are said doesn't mean really anything. All in all I think that maybe somethings of their lives are interesting to know but, only when they would like to share it, but they also need their privacy.
6.05 I think that famous people should be left alone after all they are people to. The media should be only allowed to show the world what the famous persons and such tell them specifically, what should be off limits is their bathing times and their personal activities because only pervs and peepers and other nimrods want to see that crap. I think the media really can't be regulated so there isn't much to do about that.No nothing good could ever come from the freedom of the press.
Famous and infamous people should be aloud their own privacy. I think the media needs to back off a lot and let the person live. I think if the person being followed by the media should be able to say what should and what shouldn't be open to the public. The media, if told be the person, should be left alone. Yes it would be an infringe on freedom off speech and freedom of the press. What could happen is the press could get irritating and the person might try to do something about it like possibly suing the press. All in all the public knowing someones personal business may be fun to know but it could greatly affect the person its about.
6.20 I think famous or infamous person should be able to have the same amount of privacy as a regular person. I think that the media should only be able to show things that the famous or infamous person wants to be shown. I think that the that laws involving media should be changed to protect the privacy of everyone. Even though some of the things the media puts up is good for the people to know, I don't think that they should be able to put it into the media without the consent of the person. Public access to peoples lives doesn't really serve any good, so it shouldn't be allowed.
6:8 The press should have limits to interfere with the community. Not just famous people, every one should be protected from the press. They might ruin some ones life. That is against our rights. If they didn't have any rights their would be too many fights about personal space. It would serve a good purpose for giving the media limits.
6.6 I believe that famous people should be able to protect their privacy. The media should only be allowed to show the public what their famous for and what they don't care what the media shows. They media should go to that person and ask before they show what they want to the public. It shouldn't effect their freedom of speech, they are aloud to speak what they believe but should have permission to speak about the persons personal life. Public access to someone's personal life might be good if it warns or helps civilians lives not for entertainment.
6.4 Famous or infamous people should protect their privacy. What the media should be able to show is when their out in public and when they want be scene. What should be off limits is when there at there homes. Media should be regulated by they shouldn't be standing out side next too their house. Public access to lives of famous and infamous severs a good purpose to people so they show their normal persons.
6.15 A famous person should be able to protect their personal privacy. The media should not be able to show anything to the world that was not approved by the person it is about. If media was not regulated, there would be a lot of stuff that other people shouldn’t really see. Public access to the lives of the famous kind of serve a good purpose. They just go a little to far with what they do.
People famous or infamous should have privacy. They should be allowed to show anything that the person has so consent to the invitation of the privacy. I think that the media can be regulated,by the things/shows should be approved by a group of people. NO! Any one can say anything, but only with the understanding that there are consequences to the things that people say and do. They might serve a good purpose, but if it is because of there past then that is crap! People can and will change. Especially if they spend time in jail/prison.You do not no what the effect of this do on people. All in all, people should have privacy.
6.28 I think that famous people should have there privacy. There should be limit to what the media should post. Some times they could post the things that the famous people want them to post like there love life or something like that.But i think that it is wrong to go to far and sneak around there privacy life. I think that is wrong.Sometimes it serve a purpose I think. So all in all I think that there should be a limit of the famous people privacy.
6.27 I think that famous people should be able to protect their personal privacy because they should protect their privacy if they want to. The media should be able to show the world the things that the famous people want them to show to the world. The media should not show things to the world that famous people don't want them to show. I think that sometimes public access to the lives of famous and infamous doesn't sever any good purpose and sometimes it does. Clearly, those are the reasons why I think that famous people should be able to protect their personal privacy.
6.13 People should be adle to protect their persional privacy. the media should be allowed to show intervews and the facts. the media can be regulated by asking the persion. All in all, public access to the lives of famous people does not serve any good purpose.
I agree that famous people should be able to protect their privacy. I also agree that they should be given permission to use some of the things they have dug up about the person.
I think famous people should have privacy. The media should not be able to show anything they want. 6.12 The reason I say they should be able to show anything they want because they can not be controlled. even though famous people do deserve privacy they are not going to get it. If the media was not regulated they would go crazy and say up urs old man. in conclusion i don't think it serves a good purpose to have access to famous peoples personal life its a waste of time.
6.10 I think famous people should be able to if they need to . like what if they had a stoker on they are really famous and is going to a another country and they have a lot of people who are flowing them over and are just like up yours old man all the time there then I think it would be fine to do that and if there are a bunch of people all over them then they should get something to get them away from them for a cupale of years or so and that is why i think they should have some personal privacy in there life's so the end.
6.26 Famous or infamous people should be able to protect their personal privacy because they are still people an have the right to live their lives without media taking pictures and putting it on television. The media should have limits to what to show like they shouldn't be able to show some thing embarrassing or intimate. They should only able to show some thing that the famous or infamous person allows. Regulating the media is not a bad idea because then they will stop their harassment. The regulation of press won't really infringe with the rights of free speech and freedom of the press because they don't have the right to harass the famous or infamous person. If the media is not regulated then they will get out of control an some thing is going to happen to a level that is not wanted. The public access to the live of famous an infamous people is not a good serve of the medias time because why do you have to see a person 24 hours a day. In fact, medias time should be used to see real problems in the world not the person that every one will forget in the next week.
6.29 - 05, I don't think you understand the full view of the question you completely forget to mention the 4th question which states "Would regulation infringe upon the rights of free speech and freedom of the press?" I also don't think that you don't understand how media works, most people need their job to keep their house and to eat, so they do these creepy *****ing things that ****ers and ***s.
6.1 I think that infamous or famous people should be able to keep their personal privacy. I think this because no one would like to have everybody know everything about them. Somethings should be kept specifically to the person. I also think that the media expose people and people begin to dislike that celebrity.
6.29 - 05, I don't think you understand the full view of the question you completely forget to mention the 4th question which states "Would regulation infringe upon the rights of free speech and freedom of the press?" I also don't think that you don't understand how media works, most people need their job to keep their house and to eat, so they do these creepy *****ing things that ****ers and ***s.
6-23 I think famous people should be able to protect their personal privacy. I think the media should just talk about stuff that doesn't bother the famous people like i don't think its fair to talk about their personal life. I think the media should be regulated because the media is gonna get out of control. If the media isn't regulated they would get into everybody's personal life!. In conclusion i think its good that we have a media to now everything that is going on but sometimes they get to into the persons life n i think media should only post stuff that famous people want to share.
6.24 Yes I think famous or infamous people should be able to protect their personal privacy. I think the media should be able to show pictures that the person is willing to take and they shouldn't be allowed to show anything they don't want you to show. I think it would be hard to regulate the media because they do it for the money, but they can make a law on it. I think that if the press isn't regulated, they will ruin a lot of peoples life and go crazy with it. I think it could serve a good purpose, but I still think they shouldn't do it.
6.17 I think famous people should have privacy. Although, they can sign a damn autograph or two! I think this because if I were a famous person, I'd be fine with signing autographs. Some famous people go way to far with privacy.
6.22--> I think famous people should be able to have privacy. I think the only things that the media should share is what the famous does in public. The things that should be off limits is the things that they do at home and the things that regular people do to. The media could be regulated by the famous telling the public to leave them alone. If the famous did say they wanted to be left alone, Then the media would make up rumors and make the celebrities life horrible. If the media were trying to get good news then they wouldn't get that many good reports. That probably why they go into the homes of they famous. All in all, I don't think the media should have access to the celebrities personal lives.
I think that famous people should be able to protect their personal privacy. The media should only show the world like who they are and some information about them. what should be off limits is their personal activities and what are they doing with someone because there some weird people who would want to see those stuff. what i think the media really can't be regulated like not much about that. So i think it should have privacy for famous people.
I think famous people should have privacy just like us because they are human beans just like us. they should have privacy because every body should have their own privacy. that is why famous people should have privacy. by:seth barela!
I think famous people should have privacy just like us because they are human beans just like us. they should have privacy because every body should have their own privacy. that is why famous people should have privacy. by:seth barela!
6.0 I think famous or infamous person should be able to have the same amount of privacy as a regular person. The media shouldnt be only allowed to show the world what the famous persons or non-famous are doin on there personal time. what should be off limits is their personal time with loved ones. All in all the public knowing someones personal business may be fun to know but it could greatly affect the person its about and there familys.
6.21 Yes i do think famous and infamous people should protect there own personal privacy. What I think the media should allow to show to the world is whatever the want to show to the world, what they should be off limits is there relationships there special party's and other things they don't want to show to the world. I don't know how the media be regulated but I don't think there's much to do but we could try. If the media isn't regulated then things would be out of control next thing the press is in your home. I don't think public access to lives of famous/infamous serve any good, yeah everyone might like them or hate them but no one really cares about there lives they could be the same as ours or not doesn't matter.
61 comments:
1.24
I think that famous people should get privacy for their personal life. I think the media should be able to know about their personal life if they would like to share it, but with their carrier life I think we should be able to know about when a big show or movie is coming out etc. I think maybe the media should be able to get updates on celebs once or twice a month. Yes, regulating would infringe on the freedom speech and the press. If the media isn't regulated it's going to get out of control to where everyday just like now there's updates on everyone. I think it's kind of pointless to have access of the lives of famous people because, a lot of the things that are said doesn't mean really anything. All in all I think that maybe somethings of their lives are interesting to know but, only when they would like to share it, but they also need their privacy.
6.05
I think that famous people should be left alone after all they are people to. The media should be only allowed to show the world what the famous persons and such tell them specifically, what should be off limits is their bathing times and their personal activities because only pervs and peepers and other nimrods want to see that crap. I think the media really can't be regulated so there isn't much to do about that.No nothing good could ever come from the freedom of the press.
6.25\
I also agree but dont agree to 6.05
6.14
Famous and infamous people should be aloud their own privacy. I think the media needs to back off a lot and let the person live. I think if the person being followed by the media should be able to say what should and what shouldn't be open to the public. The media, if told be the person, should be left alone. Yes it would be an infringe on freedom off speech and freedom of the press. What could happen is the press could get irritating and the person might try to do something about it like possibly suing the press. All in all the public knowing someones personal business may be fun to know but it could greatly affect the person its about.
6.20
I think famous or infamous person should be able to have the same amount of privacy as a regular person. I think that the media should only be able to show things that the famous or infamous person wants to be shown. I think that the that laws involving media should be changed to protect the privacy of everyone. Even though some of the things the media puts up is good for the people to know, I don't think that they should be able to put it into the media without the consent of the person. Public access to peoples lives doesn't really serve any good, so it shouldn't be allowed.
6:8
The press should have limits to interfere with the community. Not just famous people, every one should be protected from the press. They might ruin some ones life. That is against our rights. If they didn't have any rights their would be too many fights about personal space. It would serve a good purpose for giving the media limits.
6.6 I believe that famous people should be able to protect their privacy. The media should only be allowed to show the public what their famous for and what they don't care what the media shows. They media should go to that person and ask before they show what they want to the public. It shouldn't effect their freedom of speech, they are aloud to speak what they believe but should have permission to speak about the persons personal life. Public access to someone's personal life might be good if it warns or helps civilians lives not for entertainment.
6.4 Famous or infamous people should protect their privacy. What the media should be able to show is when their out in public and when they want be scene. What should be off limits is when there at there homes. Media should be regulated by they shouldn't be standing out side next too their house. Public access to lives of famous and infamous severs a good purpose to people so they show their normal persons.
6.15 A famous person should be able to protect their personal privacy. The media should not be able to show anything to the world that was not approved by the person it is about. If media was not regulated, there would be a lot of stuff that other people shouldn’t really see. Public access to the lives of the famous kind of serve a good purpose. They just go a little to far with what they do.
NUMBER 20 I COMPLETELY AGREE MAJORLY
6.05
to 6.8
6.20
I strongly agree with you one hundred and ten percent.
Dear 6.05
I agree that the media should leave people alone. It is not right to the person their following.
6.14
People famous or infamous should have privacy. They should be allowed to show anything that the person has so consent to the invitation of the privacy. I think that the media can be regulated,by the things/shows should be approved by a group of people. NO! Any one can say anything, but only with the understanding that there are consequences to the things that people say and do. They might serve a good purpose, but if it is because of there past then that is crap! People can and will change. Especially if they spend time in jail/prison.You do not no what the effect of this do on people. All in all, people should have privacy.
6.6 I agree with 6.05 that the privacy of the famous person can protect them from other people in the world.
6.28
I think that famous people should have there privacy. There should be limit to what the media should post. Some times they could post the things that the famous people want them to post like there love life or something like that.But i think that it is wrong to go to far and sneak around there privacy life. I think that is wrong.Sometimes it serve a purpose I think. So all in all I think that there should be a limit of the famous people privacy.
6:8
To:05
What about the community. Do they not get any freedom from the press. BUt i agree with every thing else.
to 6.8
6.20
I agree one hundred and ten percent the press should have limitations.
6.27
I think that famous people should be able to protect their personal privacy because they should protect their privacy if they want to. The media should be able to show the world the things that the famous people want them to show to the world. The media should not show things to the world that famous people don't want them to show. I think that sometimes public access to the lives of famous and infamous doesn't sever any good purpose and sometimes it does. Clearly, those are the reasons why I think that famous people should be able to protect their personal privacy.
6.6 I agree with 6.20 if the media wants to be regulated then the privacy of a famous person and a regular person should be regulated.
to:6.05
Would you want someone watching your every move?
6.4 I agree with five because they are just people like all of us and they get privacy too.
6.25
I agree that people should have their own privacy... 6.02
6.13 People should be adle to protect their persional privacy. the media should be allowed to show intervews and the facts. the media can be regulated by asking the persion. All in all, public access to the lives of famous people does not serve any good purpose.
Dear 6.6
I agree that famous people should be able to protect their privacy. I also agree that they should be given permission to use some of the things they have dug up about the person.
6.14
I think famous people should have privacy. The media should not be able to show anything they want.
6.12
The reason I say they should be able to show anything they want because they can not be controlled. even though famous people do deserve privacy they are not going to get it. If the media was not regulated they would go crazy and say up urs old man. in conclusion i don't think it serves a good purpose to have access to famous peoples personal life its a waste of time.
6.10
I think famous people should be able to if they need to . like what if they had a stoker on they are really famous and is going to a another country and they have a lot of people who are flowing them over and are just like up yours old man all the time there then I think it would be fine to do that and if there are a bunch of people all over them then they should get something to get them away from them for a cupale of years or so and that is why i think they should have some personal privacy in there life's so the end.
6.15
6.4 I agree with you on everything you said.
6.6 I agree with 6.8 it's against our rights to have our lives displayed to the public and everyone should be able to have their privacy secured.
to 6.3
6.20
I do agree with you every one deserves privacy.
to:6.15
They should not have that right to be in there life!
6.26
Famous or infamous people should be able to protect their personal privacy because they are still people an have the right to live their lives without media taking pictures and putting it on television. The media should have limits to what to show like they shouldn't be able to show some thing embarrassing or intimate. They should only able to show some thing that the famous or infamous person allows. Regulating the media is not a bad idea because then they will stop their harassment. The regulation of press won't really infringe with the rights of free speech and freedom of the press because they don't have the right to harass the famous or infamous person. If the media is not regulated then they will get out of control an some thing is going to happen to a level that is not wanted. The public access to the live of famous an infamous people is not a good serve of the medias time because why do you have to see a person 24 hours a day. In fact, medias time should be used to see real problems in the world not the person that every one will forget in the next week.
6.8 I GET IT BUT THAT IS KIND OF THE PEOPLES PARTS THEY GET FREEDOM BECAUSE THE AREN'T IMPORTANT TO THE PREES.
6.29 -
05, I don't think you understand the full view of the question you completely forget to mention the 4th question which states "Would regulation infringe upon the rights of free speech and freedom of the press?" I also don't think that you don't understand how media works, most people need their job to keep their house and to eat, so they do these creepy *****ing things that ****ers and ***s.
6.15
6.8 I agree with you completely.
to 6.05
from 6.28
I totally agree with you. The media should only post what the famous people want to.And what they want them to.
6.1
I think that infamous or famous people should be able to keep their personal privacy. I think this because no one would like to have everybody know everything about them. Somethings should be kept specifically to the person. I also think that the media expose people and people begin to dislike that celebrity.
6.27
I agree with you 6.15 because the media shouldn't show things that are not approve by the person.
6.29 -
05, I don't think you understand the full view of the question you completely forget to mention the 4th question which states "Would regulation infringe upon the rights of free speech and freedom of the press?" I also don't think that you don't understand how media works, most people need their job to keep their house and to eat, so they do these creepy *****ing things that ****ers and ***s.
6-23
I think famous people should be able to protect their personal privacy. I think the media should just talk about stuff that doesn't bother the famous people like i don't think its fair to talk about their personal life. I think the media should be regulated because the media is gonna get out of control. If the media isn't regulated they would get into everybody's personal life!. In conclusion i think its good that we have a media to now everything that is going on but sometimes they get to into the persons life n i think media should only post stuff that famous people want to share.
6.24
Yes I think famous or infamous people should be able to protect their personal privacy. I think the media should be able to show pictures that the person is willing to take and they shouldn't be allowed to show anything they don't want you to show. I think it would be hard to regulate the media because they do it for the money, but they can make a law on it. I think that if the press isn't regulated, they will ruin a lot of peoples life and go crazy with it. I think it could serve a good purpose, but I still think they shouldn't do it.
6:8
TO:4 because how wants to followed around every were they go. THeir are limits. They should be obide by them.
6.4 I agree with 8 because there should be limits for media people so they don't follow they everywhere they go
6.17
I think famous people should have privacy. Although, they can sign a damn autograph or two! I think this because if I were a famous person, I'd be fine with signing autographs. Some famous people go way to far with privacy.
6.22--> I think famous people should be able to have privacy. I think the only things that the media should share is what the famous does in public. The things that should be off limits is the things that they do at home and the things that regular people do to. The media could be regulated by the famous telling the public to leave them alone. If the famous did say they wanted to be left alone, Then the media would make up rumors and make the celebrities life horrible. If the media were trying to get good news then they wouldn't get that many good reports. That probably why they go into the homes of they famous. All in all, I don't think the media should have access to the celebrities personal lives.
to 6.27
from 6.28
I agree with you famous people should have there privacy.
I think that famous people should be able to protect their personal privacy. The media should only show the world like who they are and some information about them. what should be off limits is their personal activities and what are they doing with someone because there some weird people who would want to see those stuff. what i think the media really can't be regulated like not much about that. So i think it should have privacy for famous people.
6.10 to 6.12
should not be able to show anything they want. so i think you are right
6.22--> I agree #1, because the media should respect their personal lives.
6.27
i agree with you because i think its media should only post stuff that famous people want people around the world to know.
6.22--> I agree #24, because famous people are human beings too. So they should have privacy to.
6.27
I agree with you 6.20 because famous and infamous people should have the same amount of privacy as a regular person has.
I think famous people should have privacy just like us because they are human beans just like us. they should have privacy because every body should have their own privacy. that is why famous people should have privacy. by:seth barela!
I think famous people should have privacy just like us because they are human beans just like us. they should have privacy because every body should have their own privacy. that is why famous people should have privacy. by:seth barela!
6.0
I think famous or infamous person should be able to have the same amount of privacy as a regular person. The media shouldnt be only allowed to show the world what the famous persons or non-famous are doin on there personal time. what should be off limits is their personal time with loved ones. All in all the public knowing someones personal business may be fun to know but it could greatly affect the person its about and there familys.
To 6.28
6.19 I think that you are right because famous people should have their own privacy that personal stuff that limit.
6.27
i agree with you i think people have the choice to pick what they want the media to show the world.
6-23
To 6.23
6.19 I think you are right because people should protect their own privacy.
6.1
i agree with you because as you said no one would like people to tell the world everything they do.
6.23
6.21
Yes i do think famous and infamous people should protect there own personal privacy. What I think the media should allow to show to the world is whatever the want to show to the world, what they should be off limits is there relationships there special party's and other things they don't want to show to the world. I don't know how the media be regulated but I don't think there's much to do but we could try. If the media isn't regulated then things would be out of control next thing the press is in your home. I don't think public access to lives of famous/infamous serve any good, yeah everyone might like them or hate them but no one really cares about there lives they could be the same as ours or not doesn't matter.
Post a Comment