Read the questions below and click "comments" to respond here in a well-written paragraph ofat leastfive sentences.
34 comments:
Anonymous
said...
1.22 Everyone has an identidy, some are well known and most arn't known at all. I think famous or not, you should be able to protect your personal privacy. The media should only be able to show what the victim allows to show. The media can be regulated by passing a law saying if media is at your house and you tell them to get out they, should have to get out of your property. No this shouldnt infringe upon the rights of freedom of speech. If the media wasnt regulated then things would stay the same. Public access serves some good by keeping people up to date. Im sure people who are famous of infamous want their privacy but inside they know they like the limelight.
1.12-I think people that are famous and infamous people should be able to have all their stuff private.I think the median should show things that are not important or anything that is very important to that person like if some one in that famous persons family died and that should not tell about that kinds of things.The media can be regulated by telling them that there will be a new law on them and they can't use any thing that is very important to that famous person. If the median wasn't regulated they would tell every thing about that famous person and they would expand what they hear and put it in their own words.Public access to the lives of the famous/infamous is not a good thing because every body can find out what that famous/infamous person is about and I don't think that the famous/infamous person wants every one to find out about their lives behind their own house doors.
1.25 Everyone has an identify, some are well known and most aren't known at all. I think famous or not, you should be able to protect your personal privacy. The media should only be able to show what the victim allows to show. The media can be regulated by passing a law saying if media is at your house and you tell them to get out they, should have to get out of your property. No this shouldn't infringe upon the rights of freedom of speech. If the media want regulated then things would stay the same. Public access serves some good by keeping people up to date. I'm sure people who are famous of infamous want their privacy but inside they know they like the limelight.
1.#21 When it comes to the famous and their privacy I think it is their right. But still the fact that they are famous, its expected to know about their life and see them everywhere.Its the price you pay for being famous, I guess you could say. Knowing that this statement is true they should have the choice if their family should be allowed in the grasp of the cameras and magazines. In Conclusion I think that the public access of the famous gives them the reason to be called famous. But their personal relationships and family and such should be and stay off limits.
I think that famous people should have some what privacy. The reason i say that is because they have asked to be in the public eye. They wanted to show the world there talent or beauty and so we want5 to see them all the time i mean there fans and the world. Going as far as saying that we can't get pictures with them or there signature. But then again i don't think that we should be in there face 24-7 with cameras and records. I mean they are normal people as well. I think that they should be able to get some privacy yet again i think that they asked to be in the public eye.
1.#16 My statement is that the famous has right to be private just like people like you and me. The media shouldn't be able to show the life of the famous when they are out in public. If we were out in public in jeans and a t-shirt just out for a day to yourself, you would hate it if your pictures ended up on a magazine cover or in the news paper. The media should regulate to not taking pictures for a living and chose a real job. I personally couldn't take getting shown to the public when i am in my weekend clothes.I understand that there is the freedom of press but there is also the freedom of Freedom its self. If the media doesn't regulate then pretty soon there will be no famous people to bother with stories on how people wear jeans and a t-shirt. I honestly don't think that public access serves any purpose in our lives and don't need to be shown on T.V. to better our gossip. To some it up, i believe that public access to the famous lives should be cut down either that or removed because most people don't care much for the lives of people with their own T.V. shows or their own movie.
1.08- Famous people do have the right to privacy but at the same time they have to expect publicity when they are well known. The media should not be allowed to show private things about the famous person. The media should be regulated so they can't publish super private information. Regulation would infringe on their rights but sometimes the media can cross a line. If the media wasn't regulated I think celebrities might go into hiding because of how bad it would get. Public access of the famous can be a good thing because they could catch them commiting a crime.
1.1 When it comes to the famous and their privacy I think it is their right. But still the fact that they are famous, its expected to know about their life and see them everywhere.Its the price you pay for being famous, I guess you could say. Knowing that this statement is true they should have the choice if their family should be allowed in the grasp of the cameras and magazines. In Conclusion I think that the public access of the famous gives them the reason to be called famous. But their personal relationships and family and such should be and stay off limits.
1-27..I think famous or infamous people should be able to protect their identity. The reason why is because i think everybody should have a right to their privacy. The media should only be allowed to show what ordinary people or famous people want them to show, because I don't think the media would want other people invading their life. The media should not show peoples families and other personal things i think that is going way to far. The media will do any thing to invade other peoples life. The media could be regulated by not butting in to other peoples life.I think the media has a right to their own opioun and freedom but they should know a limit of when to back off of famous or infamous people.I think if the media doesn't get regulated i think these people will take things into their own hands.I personally don't think public access serves any purpose in anything.I think the lives of infamous people and famous people should have a say in what goes out into the world.
1.17 I think they both should be able to protect there privacy because us fan's are aloud to protect our privacy. The media should be aloud to show pictures and videos but that's all. They should NOT be aloud to show there house and where they live in in "TENDERNESS." The media can be regulated by making it a law that you cant go to the infamous or famous person's house. I don't think freedom of speech would be would be affected because they are just protecting there freedom. The media might not be making anough money. I don't think public access serves good purpose. In conclusion i think famous and infamous deserve privacy like the rest of us.
1.22 I think you are wrong number 21 because it doesnt matter if there famous they still do the same things as regular people and should be able to keep their prvacy
1.#16 To #16, I agree with you all people should have privacy including the famous. Also i agree with you saying that you would rather have privacy than be shown to the world.
1.08- I agree with 25 that they should only publish what the celebrity wants them to but at the same time if the celebrity was committing a serious crime they wouldn't want that to be published but the public should know about something like that.
1.7 I think that once famous people become famous they should expect that every little secret will be exposed. I think the media should be allowed to show what they want. The media cant be regulated. The media finds secrets and exposes them to the people and the people love it and the media gets paid and the people love to gossip and talk about the famous people and know that they are not as perfect as they seem. The 1st amendment is the freedom of speech and the media takes advantage of it. Public access is a funny thing it gives the people what they want and keeps the famous--famous
1. #14 I think that famous people should be able to protect their privacy, same with infamous people. I think that famous people would be use to it though, but I still think that the media should have limits. The limits would be like staying out of their personal problems and relationships, without their permission. The media can be regulated by making laws, because that would be like the only way they would stop. If the media wasn't regulated, people would continue to be annoyed but nothing would be different. Public access to the lives of both famous and infamous people would have a couple of good purposes but, it should be limited to a certain point. So as you can see, this is how I fell about the privacy of famous and infamous people.
1.6 I think that everybody should be able to protect their personal privacy. People are still people and need privacy even if their Halle Berry their still people and need privacy. I think the media should show about what there working on like movies or coumminty service helping people. Their personal lifes like if their going to have a baby or they have a really bad break up or something crazy like that SHOULD NOT be in the magizines. Media shouldnt b able to have laws to take pictures and lie about celebrities. If meadia wasnt regulated it could probablby way worse because they would do anything to get that picture or interview. Yea it serves good and bad for both se of people its good or the infamous because they get to see someone famous but if ur famous for killing people people would b scared of you instead of happy to see you. THats what i think about the matter.
1.#16 To-#12 I agree with you all the way. Famous people e should have privacy. Also they should have the most respect on how their lives is with the media is turning their lives into a glob of crazy.
P.1 #29 Everyone has a right to do what they want with their lives. So yes I think people should be able to protect themselves from people they don't want to be in their lives. The media should be allowed to show what the person wants them to show. They should ask or tell the person what they are going to write about them. The media can be controlled by the law. No it wouldn't infringe the right of freedom speech, because people have the right to have their life private. In fact going in famous or infamous peoples lives serves no point because nobody really cares.
#23 I think famous and infamous people should. I think personal information and stuff should'nt be allowed to show unless it's okay with the person. the limits should cut off when people are at home and with their family. I think public access to personal privacy has no good purpose
1.#16 To #8, i agree that the media should only be allowed to publish the quotes that the famous wants but not the comments that can rewin their jobs. Also they shouldn't be able to show their personal lives at their homes and when they are out on runs.
1.7 At #21 I agree with you because when the famous become famous they should expect to not have much privacy and like you said "its the price they pay for being famous"
34 comments:
1.22
Everyone has an identidy, some are well known and most arn't known at all. I think famous or not, you should be able to protect your personal privacy. The media should only be able to show what the victim allows to show. The media can be regulated by passing a law saying if media is at your house and you tell them to get out they, should have to get out of your property. No this shouldnt infringe upon the rights of freedom of speech. If the media wasnt regulated then things would stay the same. Public access serves some good by keeping people up to date. Im sure people who are famous of infamous want their privacy but inside they know they like the limelight.
1.12-I think people that are famous and infamous people should be able to have all their stuff private.I think the median should show things that are not important or anything that is very important to that person like if some one in that famous persons family died and that should not tell about that kinds of things.The media can be regulated by telling them that there will be a new law on them and they can't use any thing that is very important to that famous person. If the median wasn't regulated they would tell every thing about that famous person and they would expand what they hear and put it in their own words.Public access to the lives of the famous/infamous is not a good thing because every body can find out what that famous/infamous person is about and I don't think that the famous/infamous person wants every one to find out about their lives behind their own house doors.
1.25 Everyone has an identify, some are well known and most aren't known at all. I think famous or not, you should be able to protect your personal privacy. The media should only be able to show what the victim allows to show. The media can be regulated by passing a law saying if media is at your house and you tell them to get out they, should have to get out of your property. No this shouldn't infringe upon the rights of freedom of speech. If the media want regulated then things would stay the same. Public access serves some good by keeping people up to date. I'm sure people who are famous of infamous want their privacy but inside they know they like the limelight.
1.#21
When it comes to the famous and their privacy I think it is their right. But still the fact that they are famous, its expected to know about their life and see them everywhere.Its the price you pay for being famous, I guess you could say. Knowing that this statement is true they should have the choice if their family should be allowed in the grasp of the cameras and magazines. In Conclusion I think that the public access of the famous gives them the reason to be called famous. But their personal relationships and family and such should be and stay off limits.
1.12-21, I agree with you because every one needs their privacy even if they are famous or not they all need their privacy.
I think that famous people should have some what privacy. The reason i say that is because they have asked to be in the public eye. They wanted to show the world there talent or beauty and so we want5 to see them all the time i mean there fans and the world. Going as far as saying that we can't get pictures with them or there signature. But then again i don't think that we should be in there face 24-7 with cameras and records. I mean they are normal people as well. I think that they should be able to get some privacy yet again i think that they asked to be in the public eye.
1.#16
My statement is that the famous has right to be private just like people like you and me. The media shouldn't be able to show the life of the famous when they are out in public. If we were out in public in jeans and a t-shirt just out for a day to yourself, you would hate it if your pictures ended up on a magazine cover or in the news paper. The media should regulate to not taking pictures for a living and chose a real job. I personally couldn't take getting shown to the public when i am in my weekend clothes.I understand that there is the freedom of press but there is also the freedom of Freedom its self. If the media doesn't regulate then pretty soon there will be no famous people to bother with stories on how people wear jeans and a t-shirt. I honestly don't think that public access serves any purpose in our lives and don't need to be shown on T.V. to better our gossip. To some it up, i believe that public access to the famous lives should be cut down either that or removed because most people don't care much for the lives of people with their own T.V. shows or their own movie.
1.08- Famous people do have the right to privacy but at the same time they have to expect publicity when they are well known. The media should not be allowed to show private things about the famous person. The media should be regulated so they can't publish super private information. Regulation would infringe on their rights but sometimes the media can cross a line. If the media wasn't regulated I think celebrities might go into hiding because of how bad it would get. Public access of the famous can be a good thing because they could catch them commiting a crime.
dear 1.22 i agree that even that your not famous you should be able to protect their personal security.
1.4
1.1 When it comes to the famous and their privacy I think it is their right. But still the fact that they are famous, its expected to know about their life and see them everywhere.Its the price you pay for being famous, I guess you could say. Knowing that this statement is true they should have the choice if their family should be allowed in the grasp of the cameras and magazines. In Conclusion I think that the public access of the famous gives them the reason to be called famous. But their personal relationships and family and such should be and stay off limits.
1.08- I agree with 21 that it is their right to have privacy but at the same time they are choosing to be famous so they should expect the publicity.
1-27..I think famous or infamous people should be able to protect their identity. The reason why is because i think everybody should have a right to their privacy. The media should only be allowed to show what ordinary people or famous people want them to show, because I don't think the media would want other people invading their life. The media should not show peoples families and other personal things i think that is going way to far. The media will do any thing to invade other peoples life. The media could be regulated by not butting in to other peoples life.I think the media has a right to their own opioun and freedom but they should know a limit of when to back off of famous or infamous people.I think if the media doesn't get regulated i think these people will take things into their own hands.I personally don't think public access serves any purpose in anything.I think the lives of infamous people and famous people should have a say in what goes out into the world.
number #26 started her paragragh by saying i think famous peolpe should have some privacy.....
1.17
I think they both should be able to protect there privacy because us fan's are aloud to protect our privacy. The media should be aloud to show pictures and videos but that's all. They should NOT be aloud to show there house and where they live in in "TENDERNESS." The media can be regulated by making it a law that you cant go to the infamous or famous person's house. I don't think freedom of speech would be would be affected because they are just protecting there freedom. The media might not be making anough money. I don't think public access serves good purpose. In conclusion i think famous and infamous deserve privacy like the rest of us.
1-27. number 22 i agree with you completly and i think everyone has an identity no matter who you are and should be able to protect it.
1.22
I think you are wrong number 21 because it doesnt matter if there famous they still do the same things as regular people and should be able to keep their prvacy
1.12-08, I do agree with you because every one has a right to have all their stuff private and not let anyone tell it to the whole world.
1.#16
To #16,
I agree with you all people should have privacy including the famous. Also i agree with you saying that you would rather have privacy than be shown to the world.
1.17
i agree 1.25 because famous or infamous you should be aloud to protect your privacy
1.08- I agree with 25 that they should only publish what the celebrity wants them to but at the same time if the celebrity was committing a serious crime they wouldn't want that to be published but the public should know about something like that.
1.? i agree that famous people should have their privacy and shouldnt have people taking pictures of them 24/7
1.4
1.7
I think that once famous people become famous they should expect that every little secret will be exposed. I think the media should be allowed to show what they want. The media cant be regulated. The media finds secrets and exposes them to the people and the people love it and the media gets paid and the people love to gossip and talk about the famous people and know that they are not as perfect as they seem. The 1st amendment is the freedom of speech and the media takes advantage of it. Public access is a funny thing it gives the people what they want and keeps the famous--famous
1. #14
I think that famous people should be able to protect their privacy, same with infamous people. I think that famous people would be use to it though, but I still think that the media should have limits. The limits would be like staying out of their personal problems and relationships, without their permission. The media can be regulated by making laws, because that would be like the only way they would stop. If the media wasn't regulated, people would continue to be annoyed but nothing would be different. Public access to the lives of both famous and infamous people would have a couple of good purposes but, it should be limited to a certain point. So as you can see, this is how I fell about the privacy of famous and infamous people.
1.17
i agree 1.24 media should show non important things.
1.6
I think that everybody should be able to protect their personal privacy. People are still people and need privacy even if their Halle Berry their still people and need privacy. I think the media should show about what there working on like movies or coumminty service helping people. Their personal lifes like if their going to have a baby or they have a really bad break up or something crazy like that SHOULD NOT be in the magizines. Media shouldnt b able to have laws to take pictures and lie about celebrities. If meadia wasnt regulated it could probablby way worse because they would do anything to get that picture or interview. Yea it serves good and bad for both se of people its good or the infamous because they get to see someone famous but if ur famous for killing people people would b scared of you instead of happy to see you. THats what i think about the matter.
1.#16
To-#12
I agree with you all the way. Famous people e should have privacy. Also they should have the most respect on how their lives is with the media is turning their lives into a glob of crazy.
P.1 #29
Everyone has a right to do what they want with their lives. So yes I think people should be able to protect themselves from people they don't want to be in their lives. The media should be allowed to show what the person wants them to show. They should ask or tell the person what they are going to write about them. The media can be controlled by the law. No it wouldn't infringe the right of freedom speech, because people have the right to have their life private. In fact going in famous or infamous peoples lives serves no point because nobody really cares.
#23
I think famous and infamous people should. I think personal information and stuff should'nt be allowed to show unless it's okay with the person. the limits should cut off when people are at home and with their family. I think public access to personal privacy has no good purpose
P.1 #29
17 I agree they should not show where people live or nothing.
1.#16
To #8,
i agree that the media should only be allowed to publish the quotes that the famous wants but not the comments that can rewin their jobs. Also they shouldn't be able to show their personal lives at their homes and when they are out on runs.
p.1 #29
#22 I agree they should only show the what the person says they can post or write about them.
good job #22 you made really good points
#23
1.7
To #8
I agree with you because when the famous become famous they should expect to not have much privacy.
1.7
At #21
I agree with you because when the famous become famous they should expect to not have much privacy and like you said "its the price they pay for being famous"
Post a Comment