Read the questions below and click "comments" to respond here in a well-written paragraph ofat leastfive sentences.
43 comments:
Anonymous
said...
5.8 I think famous or infamous people should be able to have the same amount of privacy as a normal person. I think that the media should only be able to show things that the famous or infamous person wants to be shown. I think that the that laws involving media should be changed to protect the privacy of everyone. I think the press already is allowed to put to much stuff about some people. Even though some of the things the media puts up is good for the general population to know, I don't think that they should be able to put it into papers and stuff without the consent of the person its about. Public access to peoples lives doesn't really serve any good, so it shouldn't be allowed.
5.4 I think that famous people should have there protect there personal privacy. I think media should ask to take photos before they do. They should respect there life. Freedom of speech goes to a point were it wont hurts others. I do under stand that Eric did something bad but he is still a person. I would want to know if he did but i would not want to stock the person. all and all famous people are just like us.
5.#28 Everyone has right to have there own privacy. I believe that famous people should be able to have there privacy. Just because there famous doesn't mean that their lives should be out in the open. The media should be regulated because they are basically are stalking. Even if there is an amendment that the media has freedom of speech, that still doesn't give them the right to display there personal life's with out their permission.All in all that is what I think about the privacy about famous.
I think famous people should protect their privacy because it's none of people's business but their own. If they have a troubled life at home people don't need to know about their personal stuff. Famous people especially don't need to give out their phone numbers,their address, or even their email. I think famous people should protect their privacy because they don't want people spying on them in public or at home. If the police are called it's probably because their privacy was invaded. News Reporters, Photographers shouldn't be snapping photos of them. It's stalking someone who doesn't want to be stalked.
5.11 I think famous and infamous people be able to protect their personal privacy because they should have privacy and not have people go on there private property and stack them or do something like that. But if your neighbor is some kind of creepy stacker or mad killer I think we should have the right so you would have a heads up on the situation. The media should be able to show what they did wrong and things like that. That is what I think about what we should be able to know.
5.10- I think people that are famous for crimes should still be able to have personal privacy. I think they should be able to talk to them or record them if the person being perused want to be talked to and or recorded. But i don't think they should be able to camp out or follow you. I think if they are caught stalking they should be find or arrested for invading personal privacy. It shouldn't interfere with any thing. If the media isn't regulated there might be more problems because of personal privacy laws. I don't think public access should be aloud to the famous because the famous might not like it. All in all, i think that public access to the famous should not be aloud.
5.24 Yes the famous or infamous people should be able to protect their privacy. The media should show them on events or in movies, they shouldn't show them sleeping or tell about their personal actions. The media should be regulated as to showing only their career lives not their personal lives. No it wouldn't go against them because the media can still show and tell about them while still giving them privacy. If the media isn't regulated then I would just stop going out and stay hidden. Public access to the lives of the famous/infamous sometimes serves as a good purpose. In conclusion, I think famous or infamous people do have the right to protect their personal privacy.
5.5 People should say when and when not to see press. Things that media should not film the privacy of their home. The media can not be regulated but they can can have limits. Press is not a bad thing their not bad people, they just need to have limits. All in all press does have the rights to film you.
5.17 I think that famous and infamous should be able to have their own privacy. Just because the famous are well known doesn't mean they have to tell everyone everything. Media press and paparazzi should only show and publish things about what the person is famous for. We did not make them famous for their personal life, we made them famous for their talent. The limits of publishing celebrity's personal lifes should not go beyond that. If there is a law to not talk about personal life things wouldn't get out of hand for example (princess Diana's death.) Our public access gives people something to gossip about and hate the famous because they are jealous,clearly i think the press should not post "personal" life of the famous for the public to see.
I think famous people should protect their privacy because if the media snaps photos of them without asking then it makes that famous person think you're harassing them and the media could get pressed charges on them. It could interfere with their personal life and it can also interpret their chance of never going out in public ever again. I agree with computer 4 because if you take someone's picture it could interfere with their chance of going out in public again.
I think famous people should protect their privacy because if the media snaps photos of them without asking then it makes that famous person think you're harassing them and the media could get pressed charges on them. It could interfere with their personal life and it can also interpret their chance of never going out in public ever again. I agree with computer 4 because if you take someone's picture it could interfere with their chance of going out in public again.
5.2 I don't agree with you because what if they are some kind of killer you and your family is know in harm. wouldn't you like to know so you can do something to protect your family??? From 5.11
5.13. I think that famous and infamous people should be able to protect their personal privacy. Why I say this is because just because their famous don't mean that the whole entire world has to know what their doing every second of the day. If I was famous or infamous then I wouldn't want people to be watching my every step. I think that that's very wrong. I think that people who do this have no life and they have to worry about other people's. Its pretty sad when you can barely walk out of the house without the media right there up, and in your face. The media should allow be allowed to show what the famous people want. Even though its freedom of speech you still cant be in peoples life's 24/7. I think if people did that to the media it would be a totally different story.
5#3 I believe that famous people should be able to protect their personal privacy? I think you can let people know the basic's of your life style and about you. I know if I was famous I wouldn't want people to know everything about me.I don't think it would effect the freedom of speech because it's your opinion. I think they do famous people think they are everything . But i don't think it's a big promblem.Clearly, famous people don't need to share their life story.
Media sometimes go to far with the rich and famous.Even though they lives are out there and movies and magazine.We still love our privacy we love to go to Wal-mart and go shopping for the food for the week you don't want to be follow down the frozen food section.And i would hate people too take pics of me without my all glam up.And i think if a famous person is like drop their kid off at their school and the media come and take pics and some crazy fan look at the pics and see were that famous person kid goes they might try too do something so i think there should be a limit on the media
5.18 Famous people should be able to protect their personal privacy. What the media should be allowed to show the world is the good side of famous people. Like when famous people are doing good things such as being with their family. What the media shouldn't be allowed to show the world is the bad side of famous people. Like when famous people are being bad as in drinking or being disrespectful. The media can be regulated by having certain permits of what they should be able to show the world. Regulation would infringe upon the rights of free speech and freedom of the press. What could happen if the media isn't regulated, is that famous peoples personal and private stuff would be exposed to the world. Public access to the lives of the famous/infamous could potentially serve a good or bad purpose. In conclusion, the media should be allowed to show their free speech; yet, the media shouldn't be allowed to show bad stuff about famous people to the world.
5.13 to 5.8 I agree with you. Famous people should be treated like normal people, and should get the same amount of privacy as regular people have. Just because their famous it shouldn't mean anything more or anything less.
#16 Per.5 Yes, I do think famous or infamous people should be able to protect their personal privacy. I believe that it doesn't matter who you are to the world you still have the right to protect your privacy. The media should be able to show the world award events or just important events or things that famous person is. The media shouldn't tell or say anything that isn't true about the famous person. Also, the media shouldn't stalk the famous person or anything.. Sometimes the media goes to far when they take there pictures of famous people. All the things that has been said has it's spot in the Freedom Of the Press and speech. It all depends on what the information is, if it's really bad then yeah I think we should n know but, if it isn't bad at all then no thats there business not ours.
I agree with computer 28 because people have the right to have their privacy and the media doesn't need to have their personal lives in the newspapers, magazines,the news, and especially on the Gossip Channel. It's not fair to those who want to keep their lives private and people don't want to see their lives out in the open field.
5.#19 I could care less about the issues of the famous people life's because I'm trying to live my own life but I do like hearing about but I think sometime the paparazzi goes to far with the issues, I think the famous should have some privacy in life.
I think that famous should have personal privacy,because every person should have their own privacy.I think that media should have limits to what information they give to the world.I do feel that we should put information out there like if there is some molester is in the nabor hood.I do think that we should have freedom of speech but people should have their personal life.I think if that the media would get too deep into people and their lives. All and all Sometimes we may want to know things about people like how some one dies and why.
21 p.5 I think that everyone, including famous and infamous, should protect their personal privacy. How would you feel if someone is looking at you while you sleep,or stalking you everywhere you. You wouldn't like it, would you. The whole camping outside someones house should be off limits.You can have freedom of the press but you shouldn't have a camera in their face everywhere to get it. To conclude, the rich and famous should be able to protect their privacy.
5.#5 I think the press is ok. They are ok because some times we need to know about other people. The reason is if the are killers. then people would want to know. Also so that we can see what happens on the news and without the press we would not know any new news.
5.14 I think that famous people should be able to protect their personal privacy. Then again if it is something big then the people should be able to know,but there should be limits because if it is just like "oh this famous person was at Wal-mart, I thought famous people don't shop there" it would be ridiculous to tell people what they do in their everyday life. I could see telling people if they are dangerous or harmful but other then that they should have privacy.They should get in trouble for invading their personal space. I would think that famous people probably get annoyed because all they want is to be to their self's with out any invasions of their person space!!
I think that famnous and infamous people should be able to protect them selfs and there privacy because wouldnt you be mad if that was you in there case. I think thst there should be s limit to what people publish. I think thst they should be regulated by only taking picturs only if you have permistion form person. The rights of free speech and the freedom of the press has a limit and some people and just dont like when they are bing talked about 24/7 all the time. I think it dose because you never know when a killer dose something good to help out. Our a famous person doing something there not so post to do also. In conclusion at the end on one likes to be the center of attinsion and have millions of camras around you all of your life like many people out there. .5#7
43 comments:
5.8 I think famous or infamous people should be able to have the same amount of privacy as a normal person. I think that the media should only be able to show things that the famous or infamous person wants to be shown. I think that the that laws involving media should be changed to protect the privacy of everyone. I think the press already is allowed to put to much stuff about some people. Even though some of the things the media puts up is good for the general population to know, I don't think that they should be able to put it into papers and stuff without the consent of the person its about. Public access to peoples lives doesn't really serve any good, so it shouldn't be allowed.
5.4 I think that famous people should have there protect there personal privacy. I think media should ask to take photos before they do. They should respect there life. Freedom of speech goes to a point were it wont hurts others. I do under stand that Eric did something bad but he is still a person. I would want to know if he did but i would not want to stock the person. all and all famous people are just like us.
5.#28
Everyone has right to have there own privacy. I believe that famous people should be able to have there privacy. Just because there famous doesn't mean that their lives should be out in the open. The media should be regulated because they are basically are stalking. Even if there is an amendment that the media has freedom of speech, that still doesn't give them the right to display there personal life's with out their permission.All in all that is what I think about the privacy about famous.
5.2
I think famous people should protect their privacy because it's none of people's business but their own. If they have a troubled life at home people don't need to know about their personal stuff. Famous people especially don't need to give out their phone numbers,their address, or even their email. I think famous people should protect their privacy because they don't want people spying on them in public or at home. If the police are called it's probably because their privacy was invaded. News Reporters, Photographers shouldn't be snapping photos of them. It's stalking someone who doesn't want to be stalked.
4.5 I agree number 8 because the laws should be there to protect them.
4.5 I agree number 28 because we need to have privacy or there would be nothing to be.
5.11 I think famous and infamous people be able to protect their personal privacy because they should have privacy and not have people go on there private property and stack them or do something like that. But if your neighbor is some kind of creepy stacker or mad killer I think we should have the right so you would have a heads up on the situation. The media should be able to show what they did wrong and things like that. That is what I think about what we should be able to know.
5.10- I think people that are famous for crimes should still be able to have personal privacy. I think they should be able to talk to them or record them if the person being perused want to be talked to and or recorded. But i don't think they should be able to camp out or follow you. I think if they are caught stalking they should be find or arrested for invading personal privacy. It shouldn't interfere with any thing. If the media isn't regulated there might be more problems because of personal privacy laws. I don't think public access should be aloud to the famous because the famous might not like it. All in all, i think that public access to the famous should not be aloud.
5.24 Yes the famous or infamous people should be able to protect their privacy. The media should show them on events or in movies, they shouldn't show them sleeping or tell about their personal actions. The media should be regulated as to showing only their career lives not their personal lives. No it wouldn't go against them because the media can still show and tell about them while still giving them privacy. If the media isn't regulated then I would just stop going out and stay hidden. Public access to the lives of the famous/infamous sometimes serves as a good purpose. In conclusion, I think famous or infamous people do have the right to protect their personal privacy.
5.5
People should say when and when not to see press. Things that media should not film the privacy of their home. The media can not be regulated but they can can have limits. Press is not a bad thing their not bad people, they just need to have limits. All in all press does have the rights to film you.
5.17
I think that famous and infamous should be able to have their own privacy. Just because the famous are well known doesn't mean they have to tell everyone everything. Media press and paparazzi should only show and publish things about what the person is famous for. We did not make them famous for their personal life, we made them famous for their talent. The limits of publishing celebrity's personal lifes should not go beyond that. If there is a law to not talk about personal life things wouldn't get out of hand for example (princess Diana's death.) Our public access gives people something to gossip about and hate the famous because they are jealous,clearly i think the press should not post "personal" life of the famous for the public to see.
5.10- I agree with you 5.8 every one deserves the same amount of privacy.
5.2
I think famous people should protect their privacy because if the media snaps photos of them without asking then it makes that famous person think you're harassing them and the media could get pressed charges on them. It could interfere with their personal life and it can also interpret their chance of never going out in public ever again. I agree with computer 4 because if you take someone's picture it could interfere with their chance of going out in public again.
5.2
I think famous people should protect their privacy because if the media snaps photos of them without asking then it makes that famous person think you're harassing them and the media could get pressed charges on them. It could interfere with their personal life and it can also interpret their chance of never going out in public ever again. I agree with computer 4 because if you take someone's picture it could interfere with their chance of going out in public again.
5.2 I don't agree with you because what if they are some kind of killer you and your family is know in harm. wouldn't you like to know so you can do something to protect your family??? From 5.11
to 5.8 5.5 I agree completely. People have the freedom to be vied or not.
5.13.
I think that famous and infamous people should be able to protect their personal privacy. Why I say this is because just because their famous don't mean that the whole entire world has to know what their doing every second of the day. If I was famous or infamous then I wouldn't want people to be watching my every step. I think that that's very wrong. I think that people who do this have no life and they have to worry about other people's. Its pretty sad when you can barely walk out of the house without the media right there up, and in your face. The media should allow be allowed to show what the famous people want. Even though its freedom of speech you still cant be in peoples life's 24/7. I think if people did that to the media it would be a totally different story.
5#3
I believe that famous people should be able to protect their personal privacy? I think you can let people know the basic's of your life style and about you. I know if I was famous I wouldn't want people to know everything about me.I don't think it would effect the freedom of speech because it's your opinion. I think they do famous people think they are everything . But i don't think it's a big promblem.Clearly, famous people don't need to share their life story.
5.#6
Media sometimes go to far with the rich and famous.Even though they lives are out there and movies and magazine.We still love our privacy we love to go to Wal-mart and go shopping for the food for the week you don't want to be follow down the frozen food section.And i would hate people too take pics of me without my all glam up.And i think if a famous person is like drop their kid off at their school and the media come and take pics and some crazy fan look at the pics and see were that famous person kid goes they might try too do something so i think there should be a limit on the media
5.10- I agree with you 5.2 I think people shouldn't be in famous peoples business all the time.
5.18
Famous people should be able to protect their personal privacy. What the media should be allowed to show the world is the good side of famous people. Like when famous people are doing good things such as being with their family. What the media shouldn't be allowed to show the world is the bad side of famous people. Like when famous people are being bad as in drinking or being disrespectful. The media can be regulated by having certain permits of what they should be able to show the world. Regulation would infringe upon the rights of free speech and freedom of the press. What could happen if the media isn't regulated, is that famous peoples personal and private stuff would be exposed to the world. Public access to the lives of the famous/infamous could potentially serve a good or bad purpose. In conclusion, the media should be allowed to show their free speech; yet, the media shouldn't be allowed to show bad stuff about famous people to the world.
5.13 to 5.8
I agree with you. Famous people should be treated like normal people, and should get the same amount of privacy as regular people have. Just because their famous it shouldn't mean anything more or anything less.
5.5 The press has rights too but some times they take it to far!
To 5.5 I agree with you because they should be able to know when is when and what is right to put out and what is not.
from 5.11
5#6-24
i really agree with you and you have really good points
5.8 I agree with you 5.5. Press should be able to do things when their allowed to
#16 Per.5
Yes, I do think famous or infamous people should be able to protect their personal privacy. I believe that it doesn't matter who you are to the world you still have the right to protect your privacy. The media should be able to show the world award events or just important events or things that famous person is. The media shouldn't tell or say anything that isn't true about the famous person. Also, the media shouldn't stalk the famous person or anything.. Sometimes the media goes to far when they take there pictures of famous people. All the things that has been said has it's spot in the Freedom Of the Press and speech. It all depends on what the information is, if it's really bad then yeah I think we should n
know but, if it isn't bad at all then no thats there business not ours.
5#6-8
i agree with you and you have really good points
5.2
I agree with computer 28 because people have the right to have their privacy and the media doesn't need to have their personal lives in the newspapers, magazines,the news, and especially on the Gossip Channel. It's not fair to those who want to keep their lives private and people don't want to see their lives out in the open field.
5.#19
I could care less about the issues of the famous people life's because I'm trying to live my own life but I do like hearing about but I think sometime the paparazzi goes to far with the issues, I think the famous should have some privacy in life.
I think that famous should have personal privacy,because every person should have their own privacy.I think that media should have limits to what information they give to the world.I do feel that we should put information out there like if there is some molester is in the nabor hood.I do think that we should have freedom of speech but people should have their personal life.I think if that the media would get too deep into people and their lives. All and all Sometimes we may want to know things about people like how some one dies and why.
21
p.5
I think that everyone, including famous and infamous, should protect their personal privacy. How would you feel if someone is looking at you while you sleep,or stalking you everywhere you. You wouldn't like it, would you. The whole camping outside someones house should be off limits.You can have freedom of the press but you shouldn't have a camera in their face everywhere to get it. To conclude, the rich and famous should be able to protect their privacy.
5.10 I agree with you. Even criminals should get privacy. 5.10
5.28
I agree with #4 the media should ask permission to take photo's.
5.#5
I think the press is ok. They are ok because some times we need to know about other people. The reason is if the are killers. then people would want to know. Also so that we can see what happens on the news and without the press we would not know any new news.
5.18 to 5.8
I agree with you because famous people should be asked what the media should and should not be allowed to show.
5.14
I think that famous people should be able to protect their personal privacy. Then again if it is something big then the people should be able to know,but there should be limits because if it is just like "oh this famous person was at Wal-mart, I thought famous people don't shop there" it would be ridiculous to tell people what they do in their everyday life. I could see telling people if they are dangerous or harmful but other then that they should have privacy.They should get in trouble for invading their personal space. I would think that famous people probably get annoyed because all they want is to be to their self's with out any invasions of their person space!!
5.18
I agree with 28 because just for being famous doesn't mean that your life should be showed to the whole world.
5.14
Dear 5.18 I agree with you that they should be treated as a normal person and have their privacy just like a normal person.
5.14
I agree with 5.4 because photographers should always ask permission before taking pictures of famous people.
I think that famnous and infamous people should be able to protect them selfs and there privacy because wouldnt you be mad if that was you in there case. I think thst there should be s limit to what people publish. I think thst they should be regulated by only taking picturs only if you have permistion form person. The rights of free speech and the freedom of the press has a limit and some people and just dont like when they are bing talked about 24/7 all the time. I think it dose because you never know when a killer dose something good to help out. Our a famous person doing something there not so post to do also. In conclusion at the end on one likes to be the center of attinsion and have millions of camras around you all of your life like many people out there. .5#7
#7-#8agree with you because people have rights and at the same time every one has feelings....
Post a Comment