Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Period 1

Read the questions below and click "comments" to respond here in a well-written paragraph of at least five sentences.

24 comments:

Anonymous said...

1.14 I think that teens should be tried and an adult. If a teen does something like kill someone, which I would consider an adult like crime, then they should have an adult like punishment. I think that the minimum age for being tried as an adult should be twelve. If someone close to me was accused of a crime then my opinion wouldn't change. I think that if a teen commits a crime such a murder then they should have to go to prison.

Anonymous said...

1.17 Yes I do believe that teens and children should be prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced like adults depending on the crime in which they committed. Robbery and theft should not warrant to be tried as an adult, however murder and certain drug violations should be tried as an adult in the case that it was drugs like methamphetamine or cocaine. the minimum age for being tried as an adult should be 15 because they have the ability to commit the crime so they should have the ability so serve time as an adult for the crime. My opinion would be the same if me or someone close to me was facing adult crime, i would feel the same way depending on the crime that I or someone close to me had committed. All in all i believe that juveniles should be able to be tried as an adult under any circumstances.

Anonymous said...

1.8
I believe that in certain cases children should be tried as an adult. But children who are to young and have committed a serious crime shouldn't be tried as an adult.There should be an age limit. I think that a seven year old couldn't do any thing to serious on purpose. So I think in some cases children should be tried as adults.

Anonymous said...

1.13-Teens and children shouldn't be convicted,prosecuted, or sentenced for adult-liked crimes.They shouldn't send teens and children for adult like crimes because people can change but everyone deserves a second chance.I think teens and kids should get sent to jail only if it was a kidnap or rape,but they might have killed someone by accident(like they did not think about why they killed someone). The minimum age limit should be 18 because now everyone can now think on was it right or wrong. I would say do they have a second chance.I would say objection he was self defending himself.They should stay in jail till 90 if they used premeditated murder.

Anonymous said...

1.21-14- i agree because if a teen murdered somebody they have the strength to do it so it wouldn't be a mistake.

Anonymous said...

1.3 I think teens should be prosecuted and convicted like adults because they will learn the consequence of an adult and will learn not to do it again. I think which crimes should warrant adult sentences are like murder. I think the minimum age for being tried as an adult is 18 because that is the age were you start getting mature and responsibility. If someone close to me was accused of a crime I think should not be treated as an adult. I think what should be done to the juveniles is to tried to treat them as an adult but not really like tell them what will happened to you if you are an adult. I think teens over 18 years old should be treated as an adult not underage.

Anonymous said...

1.17 Number 14 i agree with you, a teen should be tried as an adult if they have committed murder or a such like crime. however, i disagree with saying that they should be able to be tried as an adult at 12 i think that would be to young and that a little kid at 12 years old would be to young.

Anonymous said...

1.13-Teens and children shouldn't be convicted,prosecuted, or sentenced for adult-liked crimes.They shouldn't send teens and children for adult like crimes because people can change but everyone deserves a second chance.I think teens and kids should get sent to jail only if it was a kidnap or rape,but they might have killed someone by accident like they did not think about why they killed someone. The minimum age limit should be 18 because now everyone can now think on was it right or wrong. I would say do they have a second chance.I would say objection he was self defending himself.In conclusion,they should stay in jail until 90 if they used premeditated murder.

Anonymous said...

1.3-1.14 I agree with you because teens should be treated as adult

Anonymous said...

1.8
I agree with you #14 because a teenager can commit a serious crime but a young child probably wouldn't commit a serious crime.

Anonymous said...

1.14 17 I agree with you that a teen should not be tried as an adult for something a silly as theft.

Anonymous said...

1.17 8, i agree with you as well if a child is to young they shouldn't be tried as an adult until they are older.

Anonymous said...

1.2
I think kids should not be trialed as adults. If they do they would be spending there whole life in jail. They would never be able to live there full life out as a normal being. If they do something really bad they should just trail them as a miner and have them go to juvy and after they turn eighteen they go to jail for awhile. Some kids have been trialed as adults for small stuff and some kid have been trilaed as minners for killing someone. They need to step up there game

Anonymous said...

1.21-8- i agree because some kids are to young to understand what they have done.

Anonymous said...

1.13 I agree with 8.His comment says in some treatments children should be treated as adults.

Anonymous said...

1.3-1.13 I disagree with you because they need to be treated as an adult so they can learn how to do things right next time

Anonymous said...

1.2
i agree with number 14 on how if they kill someone they should go to prison.

Anonymous said...

1.8
I agree with you #13 because if a child committed the crime he should pay the price.

Anonymous said...

1-6
If there is a serious crime as in murder, yes I think that teens should be tried as adults. If the teens think that they can commit all these adult crimes then they should be tried as adults. In certain cases I can see how they shouldn't be, but in most cases they should be. Finally I believe that it mostly depends on the crime and depends on the case to see if they should be tried as an adult.

Anonymous said...

1.14 8 I agree with you that a teen should only be tried as an adult for certian crimes.

Anonymous said...

1.13 i agree with 3's comment says 18 years old because that is the age were you start getting mature and responsibility.

Anonymous said...

18:
I feel as serious as the crime is, regardless, all points of view should be considered in such a trial. No matter how old the person is. Take into mind whether it was an act of self-defense or it was premeditated. In a case of abuse, it would be perfectly understandable why someone had murdered another person. The jury -with all the details- would easily have said the candidate for the trial was "not guilty".

Anonymous said...

1.1 Teens and children should not be prosecuted as adults because children can do things and know its breaking a law.Teens on the other hand if there like 16 they should be prosecuted as a adult depending on the type of crime they commit and other crimes they should be prosecuted as a juvi. The minimum age to be tried as an adult should be at least 16 because teens who are 16 should know what laws not to break but 15 and under i guess be tried as a juvi. If I was the one to be blamed for a crime and I was under age I would look at them stupid and I kinda would care because I would probably get beat. I would feel if somebody I know was a victim of a crime by a juvi I would just be like dang I really would not have a opinion because people do stupid things.juvenile’s should get the maximum for a juvi so go to juvenile detention till they are 21.

Anonymous said...

18.I think teens should bee tryed as adults for surtin crimes like robery,theft,murder and grand theft auto because these crimes are dangouros and could harm crime comiter bystanders and propertey.